Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;22(1):163-178.

A Key, Not a Straitjacket: The Case for Interim Mental Health Legislation Pending Complete Prohibition of Psychiatric Coercion in Accordance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Laura Davidson  1
Affiliations

A Key, Not a Straitjacket: The Case for Interim Mental Health Legislation Pending Complete Prohibition of Psychiatric Coercion in Accordance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Laura Davidson. Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

The practice of coercion on the basis of psychosocial disability is plainly discriminatory. This has resulted in a demand from the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (the CRPD Committee) for a paradigm shift away from the traditional biomedical model and a global ban on compulsion in the psychiatric context. However, that has not occurred. This paper considers conflicting pronouncements of the CRPD Committee and other United Nations bodies. Assuming the former's interpretations of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability (CRPD) are accurate, involuntary psychiatric detention and enforced treatment on the basis of psychosocial disability are prima facie discriminatory and unlawful practices. However, dedicated mental health legislation both permits discrimination and protects and enhances rights. This paper proposes a practical way out of the present impasse: the global introduction of interim "holding" legislation lacking full compliance with the CRPD. While imperfect, such a framework would facilitate a move toward a complete ban on psychiatric coercion. The paper outlines four essential ingredients that any interim legislation ought to contain, including clear timebound targets for full CRPD implementation. It concludes by urging the CRPD Committee to take the unprecedented step of issuing a general comment providing reluctant "permission" for the progressive realization of respect for articles 12 and 14 of the CRPD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Guidelines on Article 14 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, UN Doc. A/72/55 (2015), annex, para. 3.
    1. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, G.A. Res. 61/106 (2006).
    1. See, for example, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Concluding Observations: Australia, UN Doc. CRPD/C/AUS/CO/1 (2013), paras. 35–36.
    1. Pūras D. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, UN Doc. A/HRC/29/33 (2015), para. 98.
    2. Human Rights Council. Resolution on Mental Health and Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/32/L.26 (2016).
    1. Lamberti J. S., Russ A., Cerulli C. et al. “Patient experiences of autonomy and coercion while receiving legal leverage in forensic assertive community treatment,”. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 2014;22(4):222–230. - PubMed
    2. Akhter S. F., Molyneaux E., Stuart R. et al. “Patients’ experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: Systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis,”. BJPsych Open. 5(2019):e37. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Burns T., Rugkåsa J., Molodynski A. et al. “Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): A randomised controlled trial,”. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1627–1633. See also, for example. - PubMed
    4. Jaeger S., Pfiffner C., Weiser P. et al. “Long-term effects of involuntary hospitalization on medication adherence, treatment engagement and perception of coercion,”. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2013;48(11):1787–1796. - PubMed
    5. Swartz M. S., Swanson J. W., Hannon M. J. “Does fear of coercion keep people away from mental health treatment? Evidence from a survey of persons with schizophrenia and mental health professionals,”. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2003;21(4):459–472. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources