Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1:13:559-570.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S247267. eCollection 2020.

Telerehabilitation for Rural Veterans: A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation

Jennifer L Hale-Gallardo  1 , Consuelo M Kreider  2   3 , Huanguang Jia  1 , Gail Castaneda  2 , I Magaly Freytes  1 , Diane C Cowper Ripley  2 , Zaccheus J Ahonle  3 , Kimberly Findley  1 , Sergio Romero  1   2
Affiliations

Telerehabilitation for Rural Veterans: A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation

Jennifer L Hale-Gallardo et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. .

Abstract

Purpose: Telerehabilitation (TR) is increasingly being used to meet the rehabilitation needs of individuals living in rural areas. Nevertheless, reports on TR implementation for rural patients remain limited. As part of a broader evaluation, this study investigated barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a national TR program to meet the needs of rural Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients.

Methods: This study applied a qualitative approach to the RE-AIM framework to investigate barriers and facilitators impacting TR implementation. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with ten program managers and medical directors within the VHA at three time points during the first 18 months of implementation. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were identified describing key cultural, infrastructural and logistical, and environmental barriers impacting the reach, adoption, and implementation of TR. Within the themes, facilitators for TR were also identified to include, allowing providers flexibility in implementing TR, mentorship and development of creative approaches to TR training, overcoming infrastructural and logistical TR barriers through championing, and continuous sharing of lessons learned in a community of practice.

Discussion: This study explicates salient barriers and facilitators encountered during the first 18 months of implementation of a TR program within a national healthcare system in the United States. Implementing TR to meet the rehabilitation needs of Veterans in resource-limited rural environments requires creative approaches and flexibility, as well as perseverance and consistent championing in order to overcome cultural challenges. This, in combination with infrastructural challenges, such as lack of broadband, adds greater complexity to meeting the needs of rural patients. This study provides new and in-depth understanding of the processes by which TR is implemented in a large healthcare system and points to practical real-world lessons in implementing TR for rural patients.

Keywords: culture; evaluation; health; implementation science; technology; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Offner R, Seekins T, Clark F. Disability and rural independent living: setting an agenda for rural rehabilitation. Human Serv Rural Environ. 1992;15:6–8.
    1. Dew A, Bulkeley K, Veitch C, et al. Addressing the barriers to accessing therapy services in rural and remote areas. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(18):1564–1570. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.720346 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Echeverri RC Barriers to participation in cardiac rehabilitation: a rural perspective. 2007.
    1. Schmeler MR, Schein RM, McCue M, Betz K. Telerehabilitation clinical and vocational applications for assistive technology: research, opportunities, and challenges. Int J Telerehabil. 2009;1:59–72. doi:10.5195/IJT.2009.6014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Randall M, Kilpatrick KE, Pendergast JF, Jones KR, Vogel WB. Differences in patient characteristics between veterans administration and community hospitals: implications for VA planning. Med Care. 1987;25(11):1099–1104. doi:10.1097/00005650-198711000-00008 - DOI - PubMed