Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr-Jun;11(2):64-69.
doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_206_19. Epub 2020 May 6.

Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges and solutions

Affiliations

Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges and solutions

Nayan Chaudhari et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2020 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Drug development is a tedious and expensive procedure and it takes roughly 10 to 15 years to take a potential treatment from bench to bedside and costs the pharmaceutical companies as much as USD ~2 billion for the process. Delay in investigator-initiated studies can cause financial loss to grant providers (either public or private) and investigator's reputation may also be at stake. Participant recruitment and retention are two major bottlenecks in conducting clinical trials and contribute vastly to the delays. They are essential for both scientific validity of the clinical study and economic reasons. Thus, issues in recruitment and retention should be addressed and minimized. A proper recruitment and retention plan incorporating adequate communication between all stakeholders will eventually avoid the delays in drug development and make treatments available to the consumer at an earlier date and at a more affordable price. Awareness of challenges and reviewing strategies that can optimise recruitment and retention will facilitate drug development. The article gives a first-person perspective on challenges and proposed solutions from an experienced clinical study centre in a tertiary care hospital.

Keywords: Clinical studies; nonadherence; recruiting participants; retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Pateriya K. Patients Recruitment Forecast in Clinical Trials. 2015. [Last accessed on 2019 Dec 12]. Available from: https://wwwcognizantcom/whitepapers/patients-recruitment-forecast-in-cli... .
    1. Ray K, Tosti B. Transforming Patient Recruitment through Patient and Site Engagement. 2017. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 18]. Available from: https://wwwiqviacom/-/media/iqvia/pdfs/library/infographics/transforming... .
    1. Clinithink. A Paradigm Shift in Patient Recruitment for Clinical Trials. 2017. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan 18]. Available from: http://clinithinkcom/wp-content/uploads//2017/01/Clinithink-WhitePaper-0... .
    1. Chhatre S, Jefferson A, Cook R, Meeker CR, Kim JH, Hartz KM, et al. Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study. Trials. 2018;19:205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mbuagbaw L, Aves T, Shea B, Jull J, Welch V, Taljaard M, et al. Considerations and guidance in designing equity-relevant clinical trials. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:93. - PMC - PubMed