Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 30;9(4):1844-1848.
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_984_19. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Factors affecting supportive needs in hemodialysis patients: A literature review

Affiliations
Review

Factors affecting supportive needs in hemodialysis patients: A literature review

Attieh Nikkhah et al. J Family Med Prim Care. .

Abstract

Background: Explaining the factors affecting supportive needs of patients under hemodialysis seems to be essential to supply their needs. Also, it can help healthcare providers to make favorite decisions about care planning to improve the patients' quality of life.

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the factors affecting supportive needs in hemodialysis patients using a literature review.

Methods: This literature review was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, SID, Magiran, and Iranmedex. Data based were searched from 2000 to 2018 using the keywords of "Need", "Supportive Need", and "Hemodialysis". In a total of 239 full texts of published articles, 12 such relevant articles were selected.

Results: The finding showed that the factors affecting the supportive need of patients can be categorised into two: internal and external factors. Internal factors consist of patient-related factors, disease-related factors, and treatment-related factors. External factors consist of personal living circumstances, health system-related factors and socioeconomic factors.

Conclusion: By explaining the factors affecting supportive need in hemodialysis patients, it may help clinicians and researchers to identify the patients' need, developing an appropriate questionnaire, and implementing suitable intervention. As a result, it can improve their quality of life.

Keywords: Hemodialysis; literature review; patient; supportive needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The selection process of articles in the literature review process

References

    1. Herlin C, Wann-Hansson C. The experience of being 30-45 years of age and depending on haemodialysis treatment: A phenomenological study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010;24:693–9. - PubMed
    1. Sugisawa H, Shinoda T, Shimizu Y, Kumagai T, Sugisaki H. Psychosocial mediators between socioeconomic status and dietary restrictions among patients receiving hemodialysis in Japan. Int J Nephrol. 2019;2019:7647356. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoerger TJ, Simpson SA, Yarnoff BO, Pavkov ME, Burrows NR, Saydah SH, et al. The future burden of CKD in the United States: A simulation model for the CDC CKD Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65:403–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broers NJ, Usvyat LA, Kooman JP, Van DerSande FM, Lacson E, Jr, Kotanko P, et al. Quality of life in dialysis patients: A retrospective cohort study. Nephron. 2015;130:105–12. - PubMed
    1. Kaze FF, Ashuntantang G, Kengne AP, Hassan A, Halle MP, Muna W. Acute hemodialysis complications in end-stage renal disease patients: The burden and implications for the under-resourced Sub-Saharan African health systems. Hemodial Int. 2012;16:526–31. - PubMed