Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 2:7:233.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00233. eCollection 2020.

Artificial Intelligence in Skin Cancer Diagnostics: The Patients' Perspective

Affiliations

Artificial Intelligence in Skin Cancer Diagnostics: The Patients' Perspective

Tanja B Jutzi et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in numerous experimental studies, particularly in skin cancer diagnostics. Translation of these findings into the clinic is the logical next step. This translation can only be successful if patients' concerns and questions are addressed suitably. We therefore conducted a survey to evaluate the patients' view of artificial intelligence in melanoma diagnostics in Germany, with a particular focus on patients with a history of melanoma. Participants and Methods: A web-based questionnaire was designed using LimeSurvey, sent by e-mail to university hospitals and melanoma support groups and advertised on social media. The anonymous questionnaire evaluated patients' expectations and concerns toward artificial intelligence in general as well as their attitudes toward different application scenarios. Descriptive analysis was performed with expression of categorical variables as percentages and 95% confidence intervals. Statistical tests were performed to investigate associations between sociodemographic data and selected items of the questionnaire. Results: 298 individuals (154 with a melanoma diagnosis, 143 without) responded to the questionnaire. About 94% [95% CI = 0.91-0.97] of respondents supported the use of artificial intelligence in medical approaches. 88% [95% CI = 0.85-0.92] would even make their own health data anonymously available for the further development of AI-based applications in medicine. Only 41% [95% CI = 0.35-0.46] of respondents were amenable to the use of artificial intelligence as stand-alone system, 94% [95% CI = 0.92-0.97] to its use as assistance system for physicians. In sub-group analyses, only minor differences were detectable. Respondents with a previous history of melanoma were more amenable to the use of AI applications for early detection even at home. They would prefer an application scenario where physician and AI classify the lesions independently. With respect to AI-based applications in medicine, patients were concerned about insufficient data protection, impersonality and susceptibility to errors, but expected faster, more precise and unbiased diagnostics, less diagnostic errors and support for physicians. Conclusions: The vast majority of participants exhibited a positive attitude toward the use of artificial intelligence in melanoma diagnostics, especially as an assistance system.

Keywords: acceptance; artificial intelligence; diagnostics; melanoma; online survey; patients view; skin cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General attitude toward the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the medical field. Bar chart shows distribution of participants' answers regarding their awareness of and attitude toward AI in medical use, provided that the AI-based system can distinguish well between images of harmless moles and melanoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Confidence in AI. Bar chart shows the frequency of participants' answers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Attitudes toward different application scenarios. (A) Pie chart shows the percentages of all participants' preferences. (B) Pie chart shows the percentages of melanoma patients' preferences. (C) Pie chart shows the percentages of preferences of participants without previous history of melanoma.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Attitudes toward patients' participation. Pie chart shows the percentages of participants' preferences.

References

    1. Miller DD, Brown EW. Artificial intelligence in medical practice: the question to the answer? Am J Med. (2018) 131:129–33. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kulkarni S, Seneviratne N, Baig MS, Khan AHA. Artificial intelligence in medicine: where are we now?" Acad Radiol. (2019) 27:62–70. 10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prayer F, Röhrich S, Pan J, Hofmanninger J, Langs G, Prosch HJD, et al. . Artificial intelligence in lung imaging. Radiologe. (2019) 60:42–7. 10.1007/s00117-019-00611-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrone JJNB. FDA approves stroke-detecting AI software. Nat Biotechnol. (2018) 36:290. 10.1038/nbt0418-290 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, Godwin J, Antropova N, Ashrafian H, et al. . International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. (2020) 577:89–94. 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources