Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov-Dec;2(6):422-428.
doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps

Affiliations

Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps

Peiyu Wang et al. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019 Nov-Dec.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020 May-Jun;3(3):224. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.04.002. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020. PMID: 32672623 No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of multiple machine learning models using full retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness maps in detecting glaucoma.

Design: Case-control study.

Participants: A total of 93 eyes from 69 patients with glaucoma and 128 eyes from 128 age- and sex-matched healthy controls from the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES), a large population-based, longitudinal cohort study consisting of Latino participants aged ≥40 years residing in El Puente, California.

Methods: The 6×6-mm RNFL thickness maps centered on the optic nerve head (Cirrus 4000; Zeiss, Dublin, CA) were supplied to 4 different machine learning algorithms. These models included 2 conventional machine learning algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and 2 convolutional neural nets, ResNet-18 and GlaucomaNet, which was a custom-made deep learning network. All models were tested with 5-fold cross validation.

Main outcome measures: Area under the curve (AUC) statistics to assess diagnostic accuracy of each model compared with conventional average circumpapillary RNFL thickness.

Results: All 4 models achieved similarly high diagnostic accuracies, with AUC values ranging from 0.91 to 0.92. These values were significantly higher than those for average circumpapillary RNFL thickness, which had an AUC of 0.76 in the same patient population.

Conclusions: Superior diagnostic performance was achieved with both conventional machine learning and convolutional neural net models compared with circumpapillary RNFL thickness. This supports the importance of the spatial structure of RNFL thickness map data in diagnosing glaucoma and further efforts to optimize our use of this data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflicting relationship exists for any author.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Representative RNFL thickness maps of right and left eyes, respectively, of two healthy eyes (top) and two glaucomatous eyes (bottom).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Schematic figure for GlaucomaNet (top) and ResNet-18 (bottom).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbor, ResNet-18, GlaucomaNet with comparison to mean RNFL thickness for diagnosis of glaucoma. Mean RNFL had an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.76, as compared to the 4 models, which all had AUC values greater than 0.90.

Comment in

References

    1. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120(10):1268–79. - PubMed
    1. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: A review. JAMA 2014;311(18):1901–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bussel II, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression. Br. J. Ophthalmol 2014;98(Suppl 2):ii15–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim SJ, Cho KJ, Oh S. Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma. PLoS One 2017;12(5):e0177726. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barella KA, Costa VP, Vidotti V Gonçalves, et al. Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT. J Ophthalmol 2013;2013:789129. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types