Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010888.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10888.

Association of Gender With Learner Assessment in Graduate Medical Education

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Association of Gender With Learner Assessment in Graduate Medical Education

Robin Klein et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Gender bias may affect assessment in competency-based medical education.

Objective: To evaluate the association of gender with assessment of internal medicine residents.

Design, setting, and participants: This multisite, retrospective, cross-sectional study included 6 internal medicine residency programs in the United States. Data were collected from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017, and analyzed from June 7 to November 6, 2019.

Exposures: Faculty assessments of resident performance during general medicine inpatient rotations.

Main outcomes and measures: Standardized scores were calculated based on rating distributions for the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's core competencies and internal medicine Milestones at each site. Standardized scores are expressed as SDs from the mean. The interaction of gender and postgraduate year (PGY) with standardized scores was assessed, adjusting for site, time of year, resident In-Training Examination percentile rank, and faculty rank and specialty.

Results: Data included 3600 evaluations for 703 residents (387 male [55.0%]) by 605 faculty (318 male [52.6%]). Interaction between resident gender and PGY was significant in 6 core competencies. In PGY2, female residents scored significantly higher than male residents in 4 of 6 competencies, including patient care (mean standardized score [SE], 0.10 [0.04] vs 0.22 [0.05]; P = .04), systems-based practice (mean standardized score [SE], -0.06 [0.05] vs 0.13 [0.05]; P = .003), professionalism (mean standardized score [SE], -0.04 [0.06] vs 0.21 [0.06]; P = .001), and interpersonal and communication skills (mean standardized score [SE], 0.06 [0.05] vs 0.32 [0.06]; P < .001). In PGY3, male residents scored significantly higher than female patients in 5 of 6 competencies, including patient care (mean standardized score [SE], 0.47 [0.05] vs 0.32 [0.05]; P = .03), medical knowledge (mean standardized score [SE], 0.47 [0.05] vs 0.24 [0.06]; P = .003), systems-based practice (mean standardized score [SE], 0.30 [0.05] vs 0.12 [0.06]; P = .02), practice-based learning (mean standardized score [SE], 0.39 [0.05] vs 0.16 [0.06]; P = .004), and professionalism (mean standardized score [SE], 0.35 [0.05] vs 0.18 [0.06]; P = .03). There was a significant increase in male residents' competency scores between PGY2 and PGY3 (range of difference in mean adjusted standardized scores between PGY2 and PGY3, 0.208-0.391; P ≤ .002) that was not seen in female residents' scores (range of difference in mean adjusted standardized scores between PGY2 and PGY3, -0.117 to 0.101; P ≥ .14). There was a significant increase in male residents' scores between PGY2 and PGY3 cohorts in 6 competencies with female faculty and in 4 competencies with male faculty. There was no significant change in female residents' competency scores between PGY2 to PGY3 cohorts with male or female faculty. Interaction between faculty-resident gender dyad and PGY was significant in the patient care competency (β estimate [SE] for female vs male dyad in PGY1 vs PGY3, 0.184 [0.158]; β estimate [SE] for female vs male dyad in PGY2 vs PGY3, 0.457 [0.181]; P = .04).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, resident gender was associated with differences in faculty assessments of resident performance, and differences were linked to PGY. In contrast to male residents' scores, female residents' scores displayed a peak-and-plateau pattern whereby assessment scores peaked in PGY2. Notably, the peak-and-plateau pattern was seen in assessments by male and female faculty. Further study of factors that influence gender-based differences in assessment is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Volerman reported receiving grants from CHEST Foundation, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau Healthy Tomorrows Partnership for Children Program, and University of Chicago Bucksbaum Institute for Clinical Excellence outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Adjusted Standardized Scores in the Core Competencies for Male and Female Internal Medicine Residents
Data are stratified by postgraduate year (PGY). ICS indicates interpersonal and communication skills; PBLI, practice-based learning and improvement; and SBP, systems-based practice.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Adjusted Standardized Scores in the Core Competencies by Resident and Faculty Gender
Data are stratified by postgraduate year (PGY). ICS indicates interpersonal and communication skills; PBLI, practice-based learning and improvement; and SBP, systems-based practice.

Comment in

References

    1. Risberg G, Johansson EE, Hamberg K. A theoretical model for analysing gender bias in medicine. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8(1):28. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-28 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Axelson RD, Solow CM, Ferguson KJ, Cohen MB. Assessing implicit gender bias in Medical Student Performance Evaluations. Eval Health Prof. 2010;33(3):365-385. doi:10.1177/0163278710375097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross DA, Boatright D, Nunez-Smith M, Jordan A, Chekroud A, Moore EZ. Differences in words used to describe racial and gender groups in Medical Student Performance Evaluations. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0181659. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181659 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rojek AE, Khanna R, Yim JWL, et al. . Differences in narrative language in evaluations of medical students by gender and under-represented minority status. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(5):684-691. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04889-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Qadri U, Arora VM. Comparison of male vs female resident milestone evaluations by faculty during emergency medicine residency training. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(5):651-657. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9616 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms