Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 14;9(7):e16477.
doi: 10.2196/16477.

Premature or Small for Gestational Age Discrimination: International Multicenter Trial Protocol for Classification of the Low-Birth-Weight Newborn Through the Optical Properties of the Skin

Affiliations

Premature or Small for Gestational Age Discrimination: International Multicenter Trial Protocol for Classification of the Low-Birth-Weight Newborn Through the Optical Properties of the Skin

Zilma Reis et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: A low birth weight is an independent risk factor for adverse infant outcomes and a predictor of chronic disease in adulthood. In these situations, differentiating between prematurity and small for gestational age (SGA) or simultaneous conditions is essential to ensuring adequate care. Such diagnoses, however, depend on reliable pregnancy dating, which can be challenging in developing countries. A new medical optoelectronic device was developed to estimate gestational age (GA) at birth based on newborn skin reflection.

Objective: This study will aim to evaluate the device's ability to detect prematurity or SGA, or both conditions simultaneously as well as predict short-term pulmonary complications in a cohort of low-birth-weight newborns.

Methods: This study protocol was designed for a multicenter cohort including referral hospitals in Brazil and Mozambique. Newborns weighing 500-2500 g will be eligible for inclusion with the best GA available, considering the limited resources of low-income countries. Comparator-GA is based on reliable last menstrual period dating or ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation. Estimated GA at birth (Test-GA) will be calculated by applying a novel optoelectronic device to the newborn's skin over the sole. The average difference between Test-GA and Comparator-GA will be analyzed, as will the percentage of newborns who are correctly diagnosed as preterm or SGA. In addition, in a nested case-control study, the accuracy of skin reflection in the prediction of prematurity-related respiratory problems will be evaluated. The estimated required sample size is 298 newborns.

Results: Teams of health professionals were trained, and standard operating procedures were developed following the good practice guidelines for the clinical investigation of medical devices for human participants. The first recruitment started in March 2019 in Brazil. Data collection is planned to end in December 2020, and the results should be available in March 2021.

Conclusions: The results of this clinical study have the potential to validate a new device to easily assess postnatal GA, supporting SGA identification when pregnancy dating is unreliable or unknown.

Trial registration: ReBec: RBR-33rnjf; http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-33rnjf/.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/16477.

Keywords: childbirth; equipment and supplies; fetal growth restriction; photomedicine; prematurity; skin physiological phenomena.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Authors declare a patent deposit on behalf of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais, Brazil, http://www.fapemig.br/en/. The inventors were ZR and RG: BR1020170235688 (CTIT-PN862).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The development timeline of the preemie-test device. GA: gestational age.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Castanys-Muñoz E, Kennedy K, Castañeda-Gutiérrez E, Forsyth S, Godfrey KM, Koletzko B, Ozanne SE, Rueda R, Schoemaker M, van der Beek EM, van Buuren S, Ong KK. Systematic review indicates postnatal growth in term infants born small-for-gestational-age being associated with later neurocognitive and metabolic outcomes. Acta Paediatr. 2017 Aug;106(8):1230–1238. doi: 10.1111/apa.13868. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28382722 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garite TJ, Clark R, Thorp JA. Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;191(2):481–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howson CP, Kinney MV, McDougall L, Lawn JE. Born Too Soon: Preterm birth matters. Reprod Health. 2013 Nov 15;10:S1 (2013). doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-s1-s1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Figueras F, Savchev S, Triunfo S, Crovetto F, Gratacos E. An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan 27;45(3):279–285. doi: 10.1002/uog.14714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhutta Z, Giuliani F, Haroon A, Knight H, Albernaz E, Batra M, Bhat B, Bertino E, McCormick K, Ochieng R, Rajan V, Ruyan P, Cheikh Ismail L, Paul V. Standardisation of neonatal clinical practice. BJOG. 2013 Jul 11;120:56–63. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12312. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources