Bone-Graft Resorption Reduced by the Induced Membrane Technique and Factors Affecting Volumetric Changes: An Analysis of 120 Serial Computed Tomographic Scans in 40 Patients
- PMID: 32675677
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00804
Bone-Graft Resorption Reduced by the Induced Membrane Technique and Factors Affecting Volumetric Changes: An Analysis of 120 Serial Computed Tomographic Scans in 40 Patients
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the volumetric changes of grafted bone over time when using the induced membrane technique. This study investigates the volumetric changes of bone graft using serial computed tomographic (CT) scans following the induced membrane technique.
Methods: Patients with critical-sized bone defects had serial CT scans after undergoing bone-grafting using the induced membrane technique. CT scans to evaluate the volume of bone graft were obtained immediately postoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. The change in the volume of bone graft was determined at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patient demographic characteristics, the location and composition of the bone graft, and the type of fixation construct were analyzed.
Results: Forty patients met inclusion criteria. There were 27 tibiae and 13 femora with a mean size defect of 8.6 cm (range, 2.5 to 20.6 cm). Of these patients, 21 received autograft with cancellous bone graft and 19 received mixed autogenous bone with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) at a mean time of 17 weeks after the membrane formation. For the first 6 months, there was an overall osseous resorption of -9.9%. The overall graft volume from 6 to 12 months demonstrated an increase of osseous volume by +1.6%. For the entire 12-month period, there was a mean graft volume resorption of -8.3%. A correlation was found between the early volumetric changes of grafted bone and the percentage of DBM in the graft mixture. A correlation was also found between the late volumetric changes and the location of defect or the type of fixation.
Conclusions: At 1 year after use of the induced membrane technique for the treatment of a critical-sized bone defect, resorption of the grafted bone averaged -8.3%. The volumetric changes were influenced by the property of the grafted bone, the fixation construct, and the location of the defect.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
References
-
- Mauffrey C, Barlow BT, Smith W. Management of segmental bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Mar;23(3):143-53.
-
- Keating JF, Simpson AH, Robinson CM. The management of fractures with bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Feb;87(2):142-50.
-
- Nauth A, McKee MD, Einhorn TA, Watson JT, Li R, Schemitsch EH. Managing bone defects. J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Aug;25(8):462-6.
-
- Lauthe O, Soubeyrand M, Babinet A, Dumaine V, Anract P, Biau DJ. The indications and donor-site morbidity of tibial cortical strut autografts in the management of defects in long bones. Bone Joint J. 2018 May 1;100-B(5):667-74.
-
- Tetsworth K, Paley D, Sen C, Jaffe M, Maar DC, Glatt V, Hohmann E, Herzenberg JE. Bone transport versus acute shortening for the management of infected tibial non-unions with bone defects. Injury. 2017 Oct;48(10):2276-84. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
