Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;9(3):1296-1305.
doi: 10.21037/tau-19-624.

Metastasectomy of oligometastatic urothelial cancer: a single-center experience

Affiliations

Metastasectomy of oligometastatic urothelial cancer: a single-center experience

Tim Muilwijk et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Survival in patients with urothelial cancer (UC) recurrence after initial treatment with curative intent is limited and treatment options are sparse. Metastasectomy could be considered a treatment option in selected cases. Identifying prognostic factors for survival can be used to counsel patients and aid multidisciplinary teams in making treatment decisions.

Methods: We collected a retrospective case series of patients undergoing metastasectomy for oligometastatic UC between 1999 and 2018 at University Hospitals Leuven. Oligometastatic UC was defined as recurrence of UC in a single organ with ≤3 metastases. Survival outcomes of interest were: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and secondary recurrence-free survival (RFS2). Complications were reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Survival analysis are descriptive and were performed using Kaplan-Meier plots to visualize survival data and log-rank was used to compare survival between groups.

Results: From 1999 to 2018, a total of 22 patients underwent metastasectomy of oligometastatic UC. Metastasectomy sites were: pulmonary (59.1%), loco-regional (13.6%), hepatic (9.1%), adrenal (4.5%), testicular (4.5%), nodal above aortic bifurcation (4.5%), and renal transplant (4.5%). The 5-year OS, CSS and RFS2 after metastasectomy were 51.4%, 57.0%, and 49.9%, respectively. Patients with primary upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) involvement and patients treated with hepatic metastasectomy had a significantly worse OS, CSS, and RFS2. Patients with a lesion size >8 mm and patients with >1 pulmonary lesion had a significantly worse CSS. Two CDC grade 3B occurred during follow-up and were both non-procedure related.

Conclusions: Metastasectomy of oligometastatic UC is feasible and can achieve durable cancer control in a highly selected subgroup of patients. Our results suggest that patients with hepatic metastases or primary UTUC involvement could be considered poor candidates for metastasectomy, while patients with a small (<8 mm) or solitary pulmonary lesion might benefit most. These findings should be validated in multi-institutional collaborations or prospective clinical studies.

Keywords: Urothelial cancer (UC); metastasectomy; metastatic urothelial cancer (metastatic UC); oligometastatic; recurrence; solitary metastasis; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-19-624). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patients’ selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
OS of all patients: the 5-year OS was 51.4% (95% CI: 32.4–81.4) with a median OS of 98.2 months (95% CI: 23.4–NR). Dotted lines are the CI. OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; NR, not reached.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Therapeutic flow of all patients undergoing metastasectomy (n=22).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Therapeutic flow of patients undergoing a pulmonary metastasectomy (n=13).
Figure S1
Figure S1
OS of all patients (n=20) that did not receive any CHT prior to metastasectomy with a median OS of 98.2 months (IQR: 23.4–NR). Dotted lines are the CI. OS, overall survival; CHT, chemotherapy; IQR, interquartile range; NR, not reached; CI, confidence interval.
Figure S2
Figure S2
OS, CSS, and RFS2 of all patients (n=22) stratified by primary UTUC involvement (A,B,C) or treatment with hepatic metastasectomy (liver M+) (D,E,F). Patients with primary UTUC involvement or patients treated with hepatic metastasectomy had a significant worse OS, CSS, and RFS2. Dotted lines are the CI. OS, overall survival; CSS, cancer-specific survival; RFS2, secondary recurrence-free survival; UTUC, upper tract urothelial cancer; CI, confidence interval.
Figure S3
Figure S3
CSS of patients (n=20) with available data regarding tumor size stratified by lesion size: 8 vs. >8 mm. Patients with a lesion size >8 mm had a significant worse CSS. Dotted lines are the CI. CSS, cancer-specific survival; CI, confidence interval.
Figure S4
Figure S4
CSS of patients treated with pulmonary metastasectomy (n=13) stratified by number of lesions: solitary vs. >1. Patients with more than one lesion had a significant worse CSS. Dotted lines are the CI. CSS, cancer-specific survival; CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration , Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:524-48. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:666-75. 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rink M, Lee DJ, Kent M, et al. Predictors of cancer-specific mortality after disease recurrence following radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2013;111:E30-6. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11433.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robinson AG, Wei X, Vera-Badillo FE, et al. Palliative chemotherapy for bladder cancer: treatment delivery and outcomes in the general population. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017;15:e535-41. 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.12.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Resch I, Shariat SF, Gust KM. PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors after platinum-based chemotherapy or in first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients: Dramatic improvement of prognosis and overall survival after decades of hopelessness in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Memo 2018;11:43-6. 10.1007/s12254-018-0396-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed