Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 23;1(3):100034.
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100034.

DNA Repair Gene Mutations as Predictors of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response beyond Tumor Mutation Burden

Affiliations

DNA Repair Gene Mutations as Predictors of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response beyond Tumor Mutation Burden

David Hsiehchen et al. Cell Rep Med. .

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, but prediction of their benefit is challenging. Neoantigens generated through impaired non-mismatch DNA repair may result in greater ICI activity. By analyzing 1,661 ICI-treated patients, we show that deletions and mutations in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and homologous repair (HR) pathways are predictors of ICI benefit independent of tumor mutation burden and tumor type. NER and HR mutations are also associated with objective response rates to ICIs in esophagogastric and non-small-cell lung cancers. In a cohort of 40,181 unique patients, NER and HR mutations are present in 3.4% and 13.9% of cancers, respectively. These results indicate that NER and HR gene mutations occur in a subpopulation of cancer patients and may aid patient selection for ICI therapy. Assessing NER and HR mutations in the context of other biomarkers may yield powerful predictors of ICI activity across different cancer types.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS R.M.S. and L.G.T.M. are inventors on a provisional patent application (62/569,053) filed by MSKCC, relating to the use of TMB in cancer immunotherapy. D.E.G. reports advisory or consulting roles for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, and Catalyst and receives research funding from AstraZeneca, Ber-GenBio, Karyopharm, and 3V Biosciences. L.G.T.M. receives laboratory research funding from AstraZeneca. H.Z. owns Ionis Pharmaceuticals stock worth less than $10,000. H.Z. has an active collaboration with Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Twenty-Eight Seven Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
DNA Repair Gene Mutations Are Associated with Longer Overall Survival in ICI-Treated Patients (A) Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves for NER mutant (Mut) and wild-type (WT) patients treated with ICIs. (B) Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves for HR Mut and WT patients treated with ICIs. (C) Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) associated with NER and HR mutations. The adjusted Cox regression model included TMB, type of ICI administered, and tumor type.
Figure 2
Figure 2
NER and HR Mutations Are Independent and Additive Predictors of ICI Response (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for ICI-treated patients with no mutations (WT), NER or HR mutations, or NER and HR mutations. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for non-MMRd ICI patients with no mutations (WT), NER or HR mutations, or NER and HR mutations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association between Objective Response Rates to ICIs and NER and HR Mutations The proportions of NER and HR Mut or WT cancers are shown for patients who had a complete or partial response (Responder) and for patients who did not (non-responder) in separate cohorts of patients with esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Landscape of NER and HR Mutations across Different Cancers (A) Waterfall plot of NER and HR mutations across 40,181 unique cancers. (B) Frequency of NER and HR mutations and median TMB by cancer type.

References

    1. Sahin I.H., Akce M., Alese O., Shaib W., Lesinski G.B., El-Rayes B., Wu C. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of MSI-H/MMR-D colorectal cancer and a perspective on resistance mechanisms. Br. J. Cancer. 2019;121:809–818. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis A.A., Patel V.G. The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker: an analysis of all US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2019;7:278. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mouw K.W., Goldberg M.S., Konstantinopoulos P.A., D’Andrea A.D. DNA Damage and Repair Biomarkers of Immunotherapy Response. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:675–693. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conway J.R., Kofman E., Mo S.S., Elmarakeby H., Van Allen E. Genomics of response to immune checkpoint therapies for cancer: implications for precision medicine. Genome Med. 2018;10:93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonneville R., Krook M.A., Kautto E.A., Miya J., Wing M.R., Chen H.Z., Reeser J.W., Yu L., Roychowdhury S. JCO Precis Oncol; 2017. Landscape of Microsatellite Instability Across 39 Cancer Types. Published online October 3, 2017. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances