Consent for Acute Care Research and the Regulatory "Gray Zone"
- PMID: 32677867
- PMCID: PMC7371242
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745950
Consent for Acute Care Research and the Regulatory "Gray Zone"
Comment on
-
Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):7-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745931. Am J Bioeth. 2020. PMID: 32364468
References
-
- Dickert N 2020. “Partnering with patients to bridge the gap in consent for acute care research.” Am J Bioeth: in press. - PubMed
-
- Dickert NW, Eyal N, Goldkind SF, Grady C, Joffe S, Lo B, Miller FG, Pentz RD, Silbergleit R, Weinfurt KP, Wendler D, and Kim SYH. 2017. “Reframing consent for clinical research: a function-based approach.” Am J Bioeth 17 (12):3–11. - PubMed
-
- Emanuel EJ , Wendler D, and Grady C. 2000. “What makes clinical research ethical?” JAMA 283 (20):2701–11. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine. 2002. Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. - PubMed
-
- Klein L, Moore J, and Biros M. 2018. “A 20-year review: the use of exception from informed consent and waiver of informed consent in emergency research.” Acad Emerg Med 25 (10):1169–1177. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical