Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):659.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05521-x.

QALY-time: experts' view on the use of the quality-adjusted LIFE year in COST-effectiveness analysis in palliative care

Anne B Wichmann  1 , Lia C M J Goltstein  2 , Ndidi J Obihara  2 , Madeleine R Berendsen  2 , M Van Houdenhoven  3 , R Sean Morrison  4 , Bridget M Johnston  5 , Y Engels  6 ; Radboud Honours Academy Think Tank
Collaborators, Affiliations

QALY-time: experts' view on the use of the quality-adjusted LIFE year in COST-effectiveness analysis in palliative care

Anne B Wichmann et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) is internationally recognized as standard metric of health outcomes in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) in healthcare. The ongoing debate concerning the appropriateness of its use for decision-making in palliative care has been recently mapped in a review. The aim was to report on and draw conclusions from two expert meetings that reflected on earlier mapped issues in order to reach consensus, and to advise on the QALY's future use in palliative care.

Methods: A nominal group approach was used. In order to facilitate group decision making, three statements regarding the use of the QALY in palliative care were discussed in a structured way. Two groups of international policymakers, healthcare professionals and researchers participated. Data were analysed qualitatively using inductive coding.

Results: 1) Most experts agreed that the recommended measurement tool for the QALYs 'Q' component, the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), is inappropriate for palliative care. A more sensitive tool, which might be based on the capabilities approach, could be used or developed. 2) Valuation of time should be incorporated in the 'Q' part, leaving the linear clock time in the 'LY' component. 3) Most experts agreed that the QALY, in its current shape, is not suitable for palliative care.

Conclusions: 1) Although the EQ-5D does not suffice, a generic tool is needed for the QALY. As long as no suitable alternative is available, other tools can be used besides or serve as basis for the EQ-5D because of issues in conceptual overlap. 2) Future research should further investigate the valuation of time issue, and how best to integrate it in the 'Q' component. 3) A generic outcome measure of effectiveness is essential to justly allocate healthcare resources. However, experts emphasized, the QALY is and should be one of multiple criteria for choices in the healthcare insurance package.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis; Focus groups (MeSH); Palliative medicine; Quality-Adjusted life years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. EuroStat . Population structure and ageing. 2017.
    1. EuroStat . A look at the lives of the elderly in the EU today. 2017.
    1. Worldbank . Health expenditure, total (% of GDP): The World Bank. 2017.
    1. Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs. Part 2: technologic innovation. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(11):932–937. - PubMed
    1. WHO . The world health report: 2006: working together for health. 2006. - PubMed