Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Oct:110:103689.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103689. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Effects of self-management interventions on heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of self-management interventions on heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Qiuge Zhao et al. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Self-management intervention is an important component of disease management in patients with heart failure. It can improve heart failure knowledge, quality of life, and heart failure-related hospitalizations of heart failure patients. However, studies on the effect of two self-management interventions tasks have reported conflicting results.

Objective: This study conducted an up-to-date systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effects of self-management interventions on heart failure knowledge, quality of life, and heart failure-related hospitalizations in patients with heart failure.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the references of articles in 14th December 2019.

Methods: The study characteristics included: authors, year, country, sample size, mean age of patients with heart failure, duration of intervention, recruitment and intervention delivery, interventions based on self-efficacy theory, cognitive behavioral therapy, disease management, self-care education. The risk of bias for each study was assessed independently by two investigators based on the Cochrane Handbook. This study used Revman to analyze different research outcomes. The fixed-effect model was used in the absence of significant heterogeneity or low heterogeneity, and if the heterogeneity was high, the random effect model was used.

Results: A total of 4977 publications were retrieved in this study. After eliminating duplicates and screening for titles and abstracts, 209 articles were retrieved for full-text evaluation. Finally, a total sample size analyzed across 15 randomized controlled trials was 2630 participants. This study showed that self-management interventions significantly improved heart failure knowledge (0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.95, p = 0.0004), quality of life (0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, p = 0.03), and heart failure-related hospitalization (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.55, p<0.00001) in patients with heart failure.

Conclusions: This study reveals the beneficial effects of self-management interventions on heart failure knowledge, quality of life, and heart failure-related hospitalization in patients with heart failure. Therefore, high quality randomized controlled designs are needed to explore the optimal self-management interventions for patients with heart failure. Tweetable abstract: This study reveals self-management interventions can improve heart failure knowledge, quality of life, and reduced heart failure-related hospitalization.

Keywords: Heart failure; Heart failure knowledge; Heart failure-related hospitalization; Quality of life; Self-management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors did not receive financial support for the research and report no conflict of interest.

LinkOut - more resources