Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 15;17(14):5103.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145103.

Characterizing the Heart Rate Response to the 4 × 4 Interval Exercise Protocol

Affiliations

Characterizing the Heart Rate Response to the 4 × 4 Interval Exercise Protocol

Justin J Acala et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

High intensity interval training is frequently implemented using the 4 × 4 protocol where four 4-min bouts are performed at heart rate (HR) between 85 and 95% HR max. This study identified the HR and power output response to the 4 × 4 protocol in 39 active men and women (age and VO2 max = 26.0 ± 6.1 years and 37.0 ± 5.4 mL/kg/min). Initially, participants completed incremental cycling to assess VO2 max, HR max, and peak power output (PPO). They subsequently completed the 4 × 4 protocol, during which HR and power output were monitored. Data showed that 12.9 ± 0.4 min of 16 min were spent between 85 and 95% HR max, with time spent significantly lower in interval 1 (2.7 ± 0.6 min) versus intervals 2-4 (3.4 ± 0.4 min, 3.4 ± 0.3 min, and 3.5 ± 0.3 min, d = 2.4-2.7). Power output was highest in interval 1 (75% PPO) and significantly declined in intervals 2-4 (63 to 54% PPO, d = 0.7-1.0). To enhance time spent between 85 and 95% HR max for persons with higher fitness, we recommend immediate allocation of supramaximal intensities in interval one.

Keywords: exercise prescription; heart rate; high intensity interval training; intermittent exercise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Mean heart rate response to each of the four intervals during the 4 × 4 protocol (mean ± SD). * = p < 0.05 for interval 1 versus intervals 2–4; (b) overall HR response during the 4 × 4 protocol for all 39 participants. Note that minutes 4–8, 11–15, 18–22, and 25–29 represent the four intervals of the session. The 2 lines represent the HR zone from 157 to 176 b/min, representing 85–95% HR max.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Mean power output response to each of the four intervals during the 4 × 4 protocol (mean ± SD). * = p < 0.05 versus intervals 2–4; (b) overall power output response during the 4 × 4 protocol for all 39 participants. Note that minutes 4–8, 11–15, 18–22, and 25–29 represent the four intervals of the session.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weston M., Taylor K.L., Batterham A., Hopkins W.G. Effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIT) on fitness in adults: A meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sports Med. 2014;44:1005–1017. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0180-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milanović Z., Sporiš G., Weston M. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (hit) and continuous endurance training for VO2 max improvements: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Sports Med. 2015;45:1469–1481. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0365-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weston K.S., Wisløff U., Coombes J.S. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2013;48:1227–1234. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092576. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Myers J., Prakash M., Froelicher V., Do D., Partington S., Atwood J.E. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:793–801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011858. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nybo L., Sundstrup E., Jakobsen M.D., Mohr M., Hornstrup T., Simonsen L., Bülow J., Randers M.B., Nielsen J.J., Aagaard P., et al. High-intensity training versus traditional exercise interventions for promoting health. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1951–1958. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d99203. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources