Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 15;12(7):1914.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12071914.

Locoregional Therapy Approaches for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances and Management Strategies

Affiliations
Review

Locoregional Therapy Approaches for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances and Management Strategies

Mina S Makary et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy and third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While surgical resection and transplantation are the standard first-line treatments for early-stage HCC, most patients do not fulfill criteria for surgery. Fortunately, catheter-directed and percutaneous locoregional approaches have evolved as major treatment modalities for unresectable HCC. Improved outcomes have been achieved with novel techniques which can be employed for diverse applications ranging from curative-intent for small localized tumors, to downstaging or bridging to resection and transplantation for early and intermediate disease, and locoregional control and palliation for advanced disease. This review explores recent advances in liver-directed techniques for HCC including bland transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and ablative therapies, with a focus on patient selection, procedural technique, periprocedural management, and outcomes.

Keywords: SIRT; TACE; TAE; TARE; ablation; chemoembolization; hepatocellular carcinoma; immunotherapy; radioembolization; transarterial embolization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma stratified by BCLC class. Note that any locoregional approach can be used to maintain or downstage to transplant eligibility. Contraindications to resection include significant portal hypertension, hyperbilirubinemia, multiple nodules, and comorbidities. Contraindications to ablation include lesion > 5 cm, > 4 nodules, and anatomic infeasibility.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kim H.S., El-serag H.B. The epidemiology of hepatocellular Carcinoma in the USA. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2019;21:17. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0681-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howlader N., Noone A.M., Krapcho M., Miller D., Brest A., Yu M., Ruhl J., Tatalovich Z., Mariotto A., Lewis D.R., et al., editors. EEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD, USA: 2018. [(accessed on 1 July 2020)]. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/
    1. Onaca N., Davis G.L., Jennings L.W., Goldstein R.M., Klintmalm G.B. Improved results of transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A report from the International registry of hepatic tumors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:574–580. doi: 10.1002/lt.21738. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Byam J., Renz J., Millis J.M. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 2013;2:22–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roayaie S., Jibara G., Tabrizian P., Park J., Yang J., Yan L., Schwartz M., Han G., Izzo F., Chen M., et al. The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer. Hepatology. 2015;62:440–451. doi: 10.1002/hep.27745. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources