Safety perspectives on presently considered drugs for the treatment of COVID-19
- PMID: 32681537
- PMCID: PMC7404855
- DOI: 10.1111/bph.15204
Safety perspectives on presently considered drugs for the treatment of COVID-19
Abstract
Intense efforts are underway to evaluate potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of COVID-19. In order to respond quickly to the crisis, the repurposing of existing drugs is the primary pharmacological strategy. Despite the urgent clinical need for these therapies, it is imperative to consider potential safety issues. This is important due to the harm-benefit ratios that may be encountered when treating COVID-19, which can depend on the stage of the disease, when therapy is administered and underlying clinical factors in individual patients. Treatments are currently being trialled for a range of scenarios from prophylaxis (where benefit must greatly exceed risk) to severe life-threatening disease (where a degree of potential risk may be tolerated if it is exceeded by the potential benefit). In this perspective, we have reviewed some of the most widely researched repurposed agents in order to identify potential safety considerations using existing information in the context of COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19; drug repurposing; drug safety; toxicology.
© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
A.A., B.K.P., C.B.‐B., C.E.G., R.L.J., R.T.K., S.H.K., S.L.P., and X.M. declare that they have no conflicts of interest. A.O. declares no direct conflict of interest but is Director and CSO for Tandem Nano Ltd and a co‐inventor of patents relating to drug delivery of infectious disease medicines. A.E.C. reports no direct conflict of interest but receives research funding for the support of S.L.P. and R.L.J. from Servier Pharmaceuticals and AstraZeneca; these are unrelated to the published work. A.E.C. receives additional unrelated research funding from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. A.O. has received consultancy and/or research funding from ViiV Healthcare, Merck, AstraZeneca, Gilead, and Janssen unrelated to the current paper. D.B. received educational grants and/or consultancy from AbbVie, Novartis, Merck, Gilead, and ViiV Healthcare outside the submitted work. M.P. receives research funding from various organisations including the MRC, NIHR, EU Commission, and Health Education England. He has also received partnership funding for the following: MRC Clinical Pharmacology Training Scheme (co‐funded by MRC and Roche, UCB, Eli Lilly, and Novartis) and a PhD studentship jointly funded by EPSRC and Astra Zeneca. He has also unrestricted educational grant support for the UK Pharmacogenetics and Stratified Medicine Network from Bristol‐Myers Squibb and UCB. None of the funding received is related to the current paper.
Figures
References
-
- AbbVie Inc . (2016). Full prescribing information—KALETRA.
-
- Agostini, M. L. , Andres, E. L. , Sims, A. C. , Graham, R. L. , Sheahan, T. P. , Lu, X. , … Denison, M. R. (2018). Coronavirus susceptibility to the antiviral remdesivir (GS‐5734) is mediated by the viral polymerase and the proofreading exoribonuclease. MBio, 9(2). 10.1128/mBio.00221-18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
