Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;33(2):e23473.
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23473. Epub 2020 Jul 18.

Skeletal muscle size distribution in large-sized male and female athletes

Takashi Abe  1 , Zachary W Bell  1 , Vickie Wong  1 , Robert W Spitz  1 , Yujiro Yamada  1 , Jun Seob Song  1 , Jeremy P Loenneke  1
Affiliations

Skeletal muscle size distribution in large-sized male and female athletes

Takashi Abe et al. Am J Hum Biol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: In healthy adults, it is generally accepted that women have less upper body muscle mass compared to men. However, it is unknown whether there are sex differences in skeletal muscle distribution in highly trained large-sized athletes. Our aim was to compare the skeletal muscle size distribution between large-sized male and female athletes.

Methods: Ten female athletes (>80 kg body mass) and twenty-one male athletes (>100 kg body mass) had muscle thickness (MT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness measured by ultrasound at nine sites on the anterior and posterior aspects of the body. Total muscle mass (SM) was estimated from an ultrasound-derived prediction equation. Body fat percentage and fat-free mass were calculated from ultrasound measured subcutaneous fat thickness.

Results: The average SM in female athletes (30.0 kg) was approximately 70% of the mean value of the male athletes (45.3 kg).With respect to MT, the relative values of femaleto male athletes were 68% to 78% in the upper body and 85% to 92% in the lower body. Similar results were observed when analyzing data for male and female athletes (n = 5 each) who were pair matched for height.

Conclusion: The relative values of MT for female/male athletes were higher in the lower body compared to the upper body. This is similar to that observed in healthy non-athletes indicating that this difference is not due to resistance training. The lower muscle mass in the arms and trunk of females appears to be a true sex difference but the cause of this difference is unknown.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abe, T., Kondo, M., Kawakami, Y., & Fukunaga, T. (1994). Prediction equations for body composition of Japanese adults by B-mode ultrasound. American Journal of Human Biology, 6, 161-170.
    1. Abe, T., Brechue, W. F., Fujita, S., & Brown, J. B. (1998). Gender differences in FFM accumulation and architectural characteristics of muscle. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise, 30, 1066-1070.
    1. Abe, T., Kearns, C. F., & Fukunaga, T. (2003). Sex difference in whole body skeletal muscle mass measured by magnetic resonance imaging and its distribution in young Japanese adults. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 436-440.
    1. Abe, T., Buckner, S. L., Dankel, S. J., Jessee, M. B., Mattocks, K. T., Mouser, J. G., &Loenneke, J. P. (2018). Skeletal muscle mass in human athletes: What is the upper limit? American Journal of Human Biology, 30, e23102.
    1. Abe, T., Buckner, S. L., Mattocks, K. T., Jessee, M. B., Dankel, S. J., Mouser, J. G., … Loenneke, J. P. (2018). Skeletal muscle mass and architecture of the world's strongest raw powerlifter: A case study. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, 9, e61763.

LinkOut - more resources