Super Fellowships Among Cardiothoracic Trainees: Prevalence and Motivations
- PMID: 32682757
- PMCID: PMC7854840
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.097
Super Fellowships Among Cardiothoracic Trainees: Prevalence and Motivations
Abstract
Background: After completing traditional fellowship or integrated residency in cardiothoracic surgery, many trainees spend time in nonaccredited "super fellowships." The prevalence and motivations for pursuing super fellowships are unknown.
Methods: A survey was distributed to all 776 cardiothoracic surgery graduates who completed training between 2008 and 2019. The number of graduates was used as the denominator to calculate response rate. Comparisons between responses were made using Fisher's exact test.
Results: Over an 8-week period, 261 surveys were completed with a response rate of 34%. The majority were traditional graduates (75%), for example, not integrated residents, and of those, 64% did a 2-year program. The majority (60%) did not pursue super fellowships. Among those who did complete a super fellowship, areas of training included congenital, transplantation, aortic pathology, valvular disease, and other. Among the 90 who completed super fellowships, reasons included "congenital" (34%), "felt training inadequate" (28%), "required for position" (24%), "personal" (6%), and "other" (8%). Among the 25 who selected "training inadequate," 32% focused in general thoracic-related areas. There was no relationship between length of traditional training (2 vs 3 years) and completing additional training (P = .17), but there was a significant association between completing a traditional track versus integrated residency and pursuing a super fellowship (P = .02).
Conclusions: Additional training in cardiothoracic surgery is common. The reasons for further instruction are varied but relate to readiness and need for specialized skills. Program directors should consider employers' needs to ensure trainees graduate with the necessary skills for future practice.
Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Readiness for Independent Practice: What Is an Appropriate Standard?Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 May;111(5):1729. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.067. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 32882200 No abstract available.
References
-
- Sarkaria IS, Carr SR, MacIver RH, et al. The 2010 Thoracic Surgery Residents Association workforce survey report: a view from the trenches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011. December;92(6):2062–70 - PubMed
-
- Stephens EH, Walters DM, Eilers AL, et al. Variability in Integrated Cardiothoracic Training Program Curriculum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017. June;103(6):1984–1991. - PubMed
-
- Shah AA, Aftab M, Tchantchaleishvili V, et al. Characterizing the Operative Experience of Cardiac Surgical Trainees: What Are Residents Really Doing in the Operating Room? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016. June;101(6):2341–9 - PubMed
-
- Tchantchaleishvili V, LaPar DJ, Odell DD, et al. Predictors of Career Choice Among Cardiothoracic Surgery Trainees. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015. November;100(5):1849–54 - PubMed
-
- Tolis G Jr, Spencer PJ, Bloom JP, et al. Teaching operative cardiac surgery in the era of increasing patient complexity: Can it still be done? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. May;155(5):2058–2065 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources