Reliability and Validity of an Adapted Questionnaire Assessing Occupational Exposures to Hazardous Chemicals among Health Care Workers in Bhutan
- PMID: 32683425
- PMCID: PMC7426735
- DOI: 10.34172/ijoem.2020.1878
Reliability and Validity of an Adapted Questionnaire Assessing Occupational Exposures to Hazardous Chemicals among Health Care Workers in Bhutan
Abstract
Background: Collection of reliable and valid occupational history data is of utmost importance to assess work-related exposures and their health effects. Few standardized questionnaires are available for the collection of occupational history data in low-and-middle income countries.
Objective: To adapt and test a validated questionnaire developed in the United States by the National Institute of Safety and Health, in order to assess occupational chemical exposures among health care workers in Bhutan.
Methods: The questionnaire was first adapted to suit the Bhutanese context with the advice of an expert review committee. 30 health care workers then completed the questionnaire at baseline and 10-14 days later. Test-retest reliability was assessed by calculating Cohen's κ and percentage agreement.
Results: The questionnaire had high test-retest reliability. Cohen's κ ranged from 0.61 to 1.00, and percentage agreement ranged from 86.7% to 100%. Further adaptations included omitting questions on chemicals not available in Bhutan.
Conclusion: The adapted questionnaire is appropriate for assessing occupational chemical exposures among health care workers in Bhutan.
Keywords: Advisory committees; Bhutan; Developing countries; Health personnel; Occupational exposure; Surveys and questionnaires.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Comment in
-
Authors' Reply.Int J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Oct;11(4):216-217. doi: 10.34172/ijoem.2020.2196. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2020. PMID: 33098407 No abstract available.
-
Comments on "Reliability and Validity of an Adapted Questionnaire Assessing Occupational Exposures to Hazardous Chemicals among Health Care Workers in Bhutan".Int J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Oct;11(4):215-216. doi: 10.34172/ijoem.2020.2196. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2020. PMID: 33098408 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Vecchio D, Sasco AJ, Cann CI. Occupational risk in health care and research. Am J Ind Med. 2003;43:369–97. - PubMed
-
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. Table II. Numbers of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by industry and case types, 2017; 2018. Available from www.bls.gov/web/osh/summ2_00.htm (Acessed July 30, 2019).
-
- Safe Work Australia. Australian Work Health and Safety Strategy 2012–2022. 2012. Available from www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/about-us/australian-work-health-and-safety-... (Acessed July 30, 2019).
-
- World Health Organization. The world health report 2006 - working together for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. Available from www.who.int/whr/2006/en/ (Acessed July 26, 2019).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical