Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul;6(3):153-164.
doi: 10.1093/workar/waaa007. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Disrespect at Work, Distress at Home: A Longitudinal Investigation of Incivility Spillover and Crossover Among Older Workers

Affiliations
Review

Disrespect at Work, Distress at Home: A Longitudinal Investigation of Incivility Spillover and Crossover Among Older Workers

Lisa A Marchiondo et al. Work Aging Retire. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

The prevalence of workplace mistreatment toward older adults is well-documented, yet its effects are understudied. We applied the strength and vulnerability integration model (SAVI) to hypothesize that, despite its low intensity, workplace incivility has numerous deleterious outcomes for older employees over time. Specifically, we investigated whether and how incivility relates to well-being outside of work, among both targeted employees and their partners. We drew on affective events theory to examine how incivility "spills over" to older targets' personal lives. We also tested whether incivility is potent enough to "crossover" to the well-being of older targets' partners at home. Based on longitudinal data from a national study of older workers (N = 598; 299 couples), results demonstrate that workplace incivility related to decrements in targets' affective well-being, which in turn, was associated with life dissatisfaction, interference with work, and lower overall health. Workplace incivility also predicted declines in partner well-being, although these crossover effects varied by gender: Men's postincivility affective well-being predicted their female partners' life satisfaction but not vice versa. However, women's uncivil experiences directly related to the affective well-being of their male partners. These results suggest that for both older workers and their partners, the harms of incivility eventually extend beyond the organizations where they originate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proposed model of spillover effects (solid lines) and crossover effects (double lines) of workplace incivility. Workplace incivility was measured at T1. Affective well-being was measured at T2. Life satisfaction, overall health, and personal-life-to-work interference were measured at T3.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Unstandardized / standardized path estimates (direct effects) for the empirical model. Dashed lines indicate nonsignificant paths. Not shown are the paths from neuroticism (T1 control variable) to the variables measured for each individual. PLWI = personal-life-to-work interference. *p < .05; **p < .01.

References

    1. Andersson L. M., & Pearson C. M (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2202131 - DOI
    1. Bakker A. B., & Demerouti E (2013). The spillover–crossover model. In Grzywacz J. & Demerouti E. (Eds.), New frontiers in work and family research. London, UK: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203586563 - DOI
    1. Barber L. K., Taylor S. G., Burton J. P., & Bailey S. F (2017). A self-regulatory perspective of work-to-home undermining spillover/crossover: Examining the roles of sleep and exercise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 753–763. doi:10.1037/apl0000196 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes-Farrell J. L. (2005). Older workers. In Barling J., Kelloway K., & Frone M. R. (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 431–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412975995 - DOI
    1. Bekker M. H. J., & van Assen M. A. L. M (2008). Autonomy-connectedness and gender. Sex Roles, 59, 532–544. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9447-x - DOI

LinkOut - more resources