Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Jan;34(1):184-193.
doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0625-x. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients

Eva Hollemans et al. Mod Pathol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

The Gleason score is an important parameter for clinical outcome in prostate cancer patients. Gleason score 8 is a heterogeneous disease including Gleason score 3 + 5, 4 + 4, and 5 + 3 tumors, and encompasses a broad range of tumor growth patterns. Our objective was to characterize individual growth patterns and identify prognostic parameters in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients. We reviewed 1064 radical prostatectomy specimens, recorded individual Gleason 4 and 5 growth patterns as well as presence of intraductal carcinoma, and evaluated biochemical recurrence- and metastasis-free survival. Gleason score 8 disease was identified in 140 (13%) patients, of whom 76 (54%) had Gleason score 3 + 5, 46 (33%) 4 + 4, and 18 (13%) 5 + 3 disease. Invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma (n = 87, 62%) was observed more frequently in Gleason score 4 + 4 (93%) than 3 + 5 (47%; P < 0.001) and 5 + 3 (44%; P < 0.001) patients. Gleason pattern 5 was present in 110 (79%) men: as single cells and/or cords in 99 (90%) and solid fields in 32 (29%) cases. Solid field pattern 5 coexisted with cribriform architecture (23/32, 72%) more frequently than nonsolid pattern 5 cases (36/78, 46%, P = 0.02). In multivariable analysis including age, prostate-specific antigen, pT-stage, surgical margin status, and lymph node metastases, presence of cribriform architecture was an independent parameter for biochemical recurrence-free (hazard ratio (HR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.7; P = 0.04) and metastasis-free (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.0-12.3; P = 0.05) survival. In conclusion, invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma occurs more frequently in Gleason score 4 + 4 prostate cancer patients than in Gleason score 3 + 5 and 5 + 3, and is an independent parameter for biochemical recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, cribriform architecture has added value in risk stratification of Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Gleason pattern 4 and pattern 5 tumor morphology.
a Gleason pattern 4, small invasive cribriform structures, 15×. b Gleason pattern 4, large invasive cribriform structures, 10×. c Gleason pattern 5, cords, 20×. d Gleason pattern 5, small solid nests with subtle intervening stroma, 20×. e Gleason pattern 5, medium to large sized solid fields, 15×. f Gleason pattern 5, comedonecrosis in a solid field, 15×.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Survival curves stratified for individual Gleason score.
Kaplan–Meier curves of a biochemical recurrence-free survival (log rank P = 0.001), b metastasis-free survival (log rank P < 0.001), and c disease-specific survival (log rank P = 0.01) in Gleason score 8 patients stratified for individual Gleason score.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Survival curves stratified for cribriform architecture.
Kaplan–Meier curves of a biochemical recurrence-free survival (log rank P = 0.001), b metastasis-free survival (log rank P < 0.001), and c disease-specific survival (log rank P = 0.01) in Gleason score 8 patients with invasive and/or intraductal cribriform carcinoma (CR/IDC+) and without invasive and/or intraductal cribriform carcinoma (CR/IDC−).

References

    1. Gleason DF. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:125–8. - PubMed
    1. Humphrey PA, Moch H, Cubilla AL, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part B: prostate and bladder tumours. Eur Urol. 2016;70:106–19. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:244–52. - PubMed
    1. Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int. 2013;111:753–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herget KA, Patel DP, Hanson HA, Sweeney C, Lowrance WT. Recent decline in prostate cancer incidence in the United States, by age, stage, and Gleason score. Cancer Med. 2016;5:136–41. doi: 10.1002/cam4.549. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms