Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul;32(4):503-512.
doi: 10.1177/1040638720936616.

Noninvasive strategies for surveillance of swine viral diseases: a review

Affiliations
Review

Noninvasive strategies for surveillance of swine viral diseases: a review

Hanna Turlewicz-Podbielska et al. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

In view of the intensive development of the swine industry, monitoring and surveillance of infectious diseases require low-cost, effective, and representative population sampling methods. We present herein the state of knowledge, to date, in the use of alternative strategies in the monitoring of swine health. Blood sampling, the most commonly used method in veterinary medicine to obtain samples for monitoring swine health, is labor-intensive and expensive, which has resulted in a search for alternative sampling strategies. Oral fluid (OF) is a good alternative to serum for pooled sample analysis, especially for low-prevalence pathogens. Detection of viral nucleic acids or antiviral antibodies in OF is used to detect numerous viruses in the swine population. Meat juice is used as an alternative to serum in serologic testing. Processing fluid obtained during processing of piglets (castration and tail-docking) may also be used to detect viruses. These matrices are simple, safe, cost-effective, and allow testing of many individuals at the same time. The latest methods, such as snout swabs and udder skin wipes, are also promising. These alternative samples are easy to acquire, and do not affect animal welfare negatively.

Keywords: meat juice; oral fluid; processing fluid; surveillance; swine viral diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Alban L, et al. The new classification system for slaughter-pig herds in the Danish Salmonella surveillance-and-control program. Prev Vet Med 2002;53:133–146. - PubMed
    1. Baliellas J, et al. Active surveillance of PRRSV in breeding, nursery and finishing farms from carcasses. Abstracts of European Symposium on Porcine Health Management; 2019; The Netherlands: [Cited 2020 June 2]. https://eaphm.org/porcine-health-management?f%5B0%5D=download_topic_filt...
    1. Biernacka K, et al. Detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and influenza A virus (IAV) in oral fluid of pigs. Res Vet Sci 2016;109:74–80. - PubMed
    1. Bjustrom-Kraft J, et al. The use of oral fluid diagnostics in swine medicine. J Swine Health Prod 2018;26:262–269.
    1. Carmeron SO, Carman WF. The use of OraSure ® collection device for hepatitis virus testing in health care settings. J Clin Virol 2005;34:22–28. - PubMed

MeSH terms