Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):1144.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09255-7.

Levels of self-reported and objective physical activity in individuals with age-related macular degeneration

Affiliations

Levels of self-reported and objective physical activity in individuals with age-related macular degeneration

Tjerk Zult et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Self-report in people with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) shows that they lead less active lifestyles. Physical activity is important as it has been shown to improve quality of life, reduce co-morbidity and also slow down the progression of AMD. Self-reported measures of physical activity are prone to subjective biases and therefore less accurate in quantifying physical activity. This study compared self-reported and objective (accelerometer-based) physical activity levels and patterns in older adults with AMD.

Methods: Data were collected in 11 AMD subjects with binocular vision loss (aged 76 ± 7 years), 10 AMD subjects with good binocular vision (aged 76 ± 7 years), and 11 controls (aged 70 ± 4 years). Binocular vision was established using visual acuity score. Contrast sensitivity and visual fields were also measured. Self-reported sedentary behaviour and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. Objective measurements were obtained with an Actigraph GT3X accelerometer being worn for seven consecutive days on the hip. The objective physical activity measures were sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, MVPA, and step count.

Results: Objectively measured MVPA was 33-34% higher for controls compared to both AMD groups (p < 0.05). There were no group differences for any of the other objectively measured physical activity variables and self-reported physical activity variables were also not significantly different (all p > 0.05). Comparing the objective with the self-report physical activity measure showed that all groups under-reported their sedentary behaviour and MVPA, but controls under-reported their MVPA more than both AMD groups (p < 0.05). Weak to moderate correlations were observed between the severity of vision loss and objective physical activity measures (all - 0.413 ≥ r ≤ 0.443), while correlations for self-reported physical activity measures were less strong (all - 0.303 ≥ r ≤ 0.114).

Conclusions: People with AMD, irrespective of whether they were vision impaired, were better able to estimate the time spent in MVPA compared to controls. However, objectively measured MVPA, was higher in controls than AMD subjects. Although clinicians may use self-report to monitor the compliance of AMD subjects with any prescribed exercise programs, they should be aware that a valid comparison with healthy controls can only be made when MVPA is objectively measured.

Keywords: Accelerometer; Exercise; GPAQ; Older adults; Physical activity; Sedentary behaviour; Vision loss; Visual impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the exercise types per group. The frequency per group is reported between brackets
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Agreement between the objective (i.e., Actigraph accelerometer) and subjective (i.e., global physical activity questionnaire [GPAQ]) physical activity measure. The panels show the Bland-Altman plots for sedentary behaviour per group (panels a, b, c), difference in agreement between groups (mean ± SD) for sedentary behaviour (d), Bland-Altman plots for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per group (panels e, f, g), and the difference in agreement between groups (mean ± SD) for MVPA (h). The round symbols represent individual scores. In Figs. A, B, C, E, F, and G: the solid horizontal line represents the mean difference between the objective and subjective physical activity score (i.e., bias) and the dashed horizontal lines represent the 95% limits of agreement. *, borderline significant difference between groups (p ≤ 0.058)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pearson’s correlations between visual acuity and objective physical activity measures across all subjects. The panels show the correlations for sedentary behaviour (a), light-intensity activity (b), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (c), and step count (d). The round symbols represent individual scores
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pearson’s correlations between visual acuity and subjective physical activity measures across all subjects. The panels show the correlations for sedentary behaviour (a) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (b). The round symbols represent individual scores

References

    1. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–131. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Capella-McDonnall M. The need for health promotion for adults who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. 2007;101(3):133–145. doi: 10.1177/0145482X0710100302. - DOI
    1. Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, Smith JL, Flaxman SR, Price H, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Leasher J, Naidoo K. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(6):e339–e349. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70113-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevens GA, White RA, Flaxman SR, Price H, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Leasher J, Naidoo K, Pesudovs K, Resnikoff S. Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: magnitude and temporal trends, 1990–2010. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2377–2384. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Economics A. Future sight loss UK 1: the economic impact of partial sight and blindness in the UK adult population. London: RNIB; 2009.

Supplementary concepts