Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):209.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01191-7.

Low-level laser therapy effectiveness in reducing initial orthodontic archwire placement pain in premolars extraction cases: a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

Mohammad Moaffak A AlSayed Hasan  1 , Kinda Sultan  2 , Mowaffak Ajaj  2 , Iva Voborná  3 , Omar Hamadah  4   5
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Low-level laser therapy effectiveness in reducing initial orthodontic archwire placement pain in premolars extraction cases: a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

Mohammad Moaffak A AlSayed Hasan et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) effectiveness in spontaneous and chewing pain reduction following initial orthodontic archwire placement.

Methods: 26 patients (mean age 20.07 ± 3.13 years) with maxillary Little's Irregularity Index (LII) of 7 mm or more that indicates first maxillary premolars extraction and no medications intake were eligible for this trial. Patients were randomly assigned with 1:1 ratio using simple randomization technique to receive either LLL or placebo treatment. Blinding was applicable for patients only. In the laser group, patients received a single LLL dose (wavelength 830 nm, energy 2 J/point) in four points (2 buccal, 2 palatal) for each maxillary anterior tooth root. Patients in the placebo group had the same laser application procedure without emitting the laser beam. Patients were asked to score spontaneous and chewing pain intensity by filling out a questionnaire with a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment application. Independent t-test was used to compare the mean pain scores between the laser and placebo groups for both spontaneous and chewing pain at each studied time point.

Results: No dropout occurred so the results of the 26 patients were statistically analyzed. Despite some clinical differences observed between the two groups, no statistical significance was found for each studied time point (p > 0.05) for both spontaneous and chewing pain except after 72 h for chewing pain with a VAS score of (18.84 ± 13.44) mm for the laser group compared to (38.15 ± 27.06) mm for the placebo group.

Conclusions: LLLT, with the suggested parameters, is not effective in pain reduction following initial orthodontic archwire placement.

Trial registration: Name of the registry: Clinicaltrials.gov Trial registration number: NCT02568436. Date of registration: 26 September 2015 'Retrospectively registered'.

Keywords: Initial orthodontic archwire placement; Low-level laser therapy; Orthodontic pain; Spontaneous and chewing pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of LLL application points
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow diagram
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean pain scores of spontaneous pain
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean pain scores of chewing pain
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dominguez A, Gomez C, Palma JC. Effects of low-level laser therapy on orthodontics: rate of tooth movement, pain, and release of RANKL and OPG in GCF. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(2):915–923. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1508-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2007.
    1. Erdinc AM, Dincer B. Perception of pain during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(1):79–85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.1.79. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989;96(1):47–53. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90228-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergius M, Kiliaridis S, Berggren U. Pain in orthodontics. A review and discussion of the literature. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(2):125–137. doi: 10.1007/BF01300354. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data