Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Sep 7;15(9):1320-1329.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.02060220. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

Utilization and Outcomes of Single and Dual Kidney Transplants from Older Deceased Donors in the United Kingdom

Maria Ibrahim  1   2   3 , George H B Greenhall  1   2   3 , Dominic M Summers  4 , Lisa Mumford  2 , Rachel Johnson  2 , Richard J Baker  5 , John Forsythe  2 , Gavin J Pettigrew  4 , Niaz Ahmad  6 , Chris J Callaghan  1   2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Utilization and Outcomes of Single and Dual Kidney Transplants from Older Deceased Donors in the United Kingdom

Maria Ibrahim et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Kidneys from elderly deceased donors are often discarded after procurement if the expected outcomes from single kidney transplantation are considered unacceptable. An alternative is to consider them for dual kidney transplantation. We aimed to examine the utilization of kidneys from donors aged ≥60 years in the United Kingdom and compare clinical outcomes of dual versus single kidney transplant recipients.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Data from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry from 2005 to 2017 were analyzed. We examined utilization rates of kidneys retrieved from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, and 5-year patient and death-censored graft survival of recipients of dual and single kidney transplants. Secondary outcomes included eGFR. Multivariable analyses and propensity score analysis were used to correct for differences between the groups.

Results: During the study period, 7841 kidneys were procured from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, of which 1338 (17%) were discarded; 356 dual and 5032 single kidneys were transplanted. Donors of dual transplants were older (median, 73 versus 66 years; P<0.001) and had higher United States Kidney Donor Risk Indices (2.48 versus 1.98; P<0.001). Recipients of dual transplants were also older (64 versus 61 years; P<0.001) and had less favorable human leukocyte antigen matching (P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, dual and single transplants had similar 5-year graft survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12). No difference in patient survival was demonstrated. Similar findings were observed in a matched cohort with a propensity score analysis method. Median 12-month eGFR was significantly higher in the dual kidney transplant group (40 versus 36 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P<0.001).

Conclusions: Recipients of kidneys from donors aged ≥60 years have similar 5-year graft survival and better graft function at 12 months with dual compared with single deceased donor kidney transplants.

Keywords: deceased donor; kidney donation; kidney donor; kidney transplantation; organ transplant; renal transplantation; survival; transplant outcomes; transplantation; utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The percentage of kidneys retrieved from United Kingdom deceased donors aged ≥60 years that were discarded over the study time period has remained fairly stable. The absolute number of kidneys retrieved and number of kidneys discarded from donors aged ≥60 years and above are depicted in the table.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Line graph and table showing the increasing number of dual kidney transplants performed from donors aged ≥60 years in the United Kingdom from 2005 to 2014, followed by a decline in recent years. The median dual transplant donor age has gradually increased. IQR, interquartile range.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
No significant difference in 5-year death-censored graft survival of single versus dual kidney transplants from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, 2005–2017.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
No significant difference in 5-year patient survival of single versus dual kidney transplants from donors aged ≥60 years, 2005–2017.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
In a propensity score matched cohort, 5-year death-censored graft survival of single and dual kidney transplants from deceased donors aged ≥60 years remains similar.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Johnson RJ, Bradbury LL, Martin K, Neuberger J; UK Transplant Registry : Organ donation and transplantation in the UK-the last decade: A report from the UK national transplant registry. Transplantation 97[Suppl 1]: S1–S27, 2014. - PubMed
    1. Remuzzi G, Grinyò J, Ruggenenti P, Beatini M, Cole EH, Milford EL, Brenner BM: Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. Double Kidney Transplant Group (DKG). J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 2591–2598, 1999. - PubMed
    1. Alfrey EJ, Lee CM, Scandling JD, Pavlakis M, Markezich AJ, Dafoe DC: When should expanded criteria donor kidneys be used for single versus dual kidney transplants? Transplantation 64: 1142–1146, 1997. - PubMed
    1. Glassock RJ, Rule AD: Aging and the kidneys: Anatomy, physiology and consequences for defining chronic kidney disease. Nephron 134: 25–29, 2016. - PubMed
    1. Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, Eknoyan G, Levey AS: Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 41: 1–12, 2003. - PubMed

Publication types