Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 21;222(Suppl 2):S142-S155.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa247.

Antimicrobial Treatment Duration in Sepsis and Serious Infections

Affiliations
Review

Antimicrobial Treatment Duration in Sepsis and Serious Infections

Lindsay M Busch et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Sepsis mortality has improved following advancements in early recognition and standardized management, including emphasis on early administration of appropriate antimicrobials. However, guidance regarding antimicrobial duration in sepsis is surprisingly limited. Decreased antibiotic exposure is associated with lower rates of de novo resistance development, Clostridioides difficile-associated disease, antibiotic-related toxicities, and health care costs. Consequently, data weighing safety versus adequacy of shorter treatment durations in sepsis would be beneficial. We provide a narrative review of evidence to guide antibiotic duration in sepsis. Evidence is significantly limited by noninferiority trial designs and exclusion of critically ill patients in many trials. Potential challenges to shorter antimicrobial duration in sepsis include inadequate source control, treatment of multidrug-resistant organisms, and pharmacokinetic alterations that predispose to inadequate antimicrobial levels. Additional studies specifically targeting patients with clinical indicators of sepsis are needed to guide measures to safely reduce antimicrobial exposure in this high-risk population while preserving clinical effectiveness.

Keywords: antibiotic; duration; infection; length; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ, Carr BG. Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:1167–74. - PubMed
    1. Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, et al. . Incidence and trends of sepsis in US hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009–2014. JAMA 2017; 318:1241–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Self WH, Semler MW, Bellomo R, et al. ; CLOVERS Protocol Committee and NHLBI Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (PETAL) Network Investigators Liberal versus restrictive intravenous fluid therapy for early septic shock: rationale for a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med 2018; 72:457–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, et al. . A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1683– 93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. ; ProMISe Trial Investigators Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1301–11. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances