Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock

Affiliations

¹ Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
² Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
³ Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Odense, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Comment

Hanne Berg Ravn et al. JAMA. 2020.

. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):302-303.

doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7557.

¹ Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
² Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
³ Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Odense, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

No abstract available

Comment in

Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock-Reply.
Dhruva SS, Mortazavi BJ, Desai NR. Dhruva SS, et al. JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):303-304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7560. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32692385 No abstract available.

Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, Hurley NC, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP, Berkowitz A, Masoudi FA, Messenger JC, Parzynski CS, Ngufor C, Girotra S, Amin AP, Shah ND, Desai NR. Dhruva SS, et al. JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32040163 Free PMC article.