Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock-Reply

Affiliations

¹ Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco.
² Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station.
³ Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Comment

Sanket S Dhruva et al. JAMA. 2020.

. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):303-304.

doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7560.

¹ Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco.
² Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station.
³ Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

No abstract available

Comment on

Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock.
Rizzo JA, Dove H. Rizzo JA, et al. JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):303. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7551. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32692381 No abstract available.
Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock.
Ravn HB, Helgestad OKL, Møller JE. Ravn HB, et al. JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):302-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7557. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32692382 No abstract available.