Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;28(2):175-182.
doi: 10.1080/09286586.2020.1791909. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

Generational Differences in the 10-year Incidence of Impaired Contrast Sensitivity

Adam J Paulsen  1 , Alex Pinto  1 , Mary E Fischer  1 , Yanjun Chen  1 , Guan-Hua Huang  2 , Barbara E K Klein  1 , Ronald Klein  1 , Karen J Cruickshanks  1   3
Affiliations

Generational Differences in the 10-year Incidence of Impaired Contrast Sensitivity

Adam J Paulsen et al. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if incidence of contrast sensitivity (CS) impairment differs by generation and identify factors to explain these differences.

Methods: The Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES) and Beaver Dam Offspring Study (BOSS) are cohort studies of aging adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Baseline examinations occurred from 1993 to 1995 (BDES) and 2005-2008 (BOSS). Follow-up examinations occurred in five-year intervals. CS testing was conducted with Pelli-Robson letter sensitivity charts; Incident impairment was a log CS score <1.55 in either eye at follow-up. Associations of incidence with generation were investigated using estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Participants (N = 3185) had a mean age of 51.9 years at baseline (standard deviation = 9.9) and 51.9% were female. Ten-year cumulative incidence of CS impairment was 40.1%, was higher among women (41.7%) than men (38.8%), and increased by age group. The risk of incident CS impairment decreased by 39% per generation. In multivariable models, the Baby Boom Generation (HR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.31, 0.58) and Generation X (HR = 0.56, 95%CI = 0.34, 0.91) had a significantly decreased risk of CS impairment compared to the Greatest Generation. Results were similar in sensitivity analyses excluding those with cataract, age-related macular degeneration, or visual acuity impairment.

Conclusion: The risk of incident CS impairment decreased by birth cohort, with the greatest reduction in the Baby Boom Generation. The difference in risk suggests that there are unknown modifiable risk factors that may help to further explain the etiology of CS impairment and provide potential pathways for prevention in the future.

Keywords: Aging; Birth Cohort Effect; Contrast Sensitivity; Epidemiology; Visual Function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest. The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institute on Aging, the National Eye Institute, the National Institutes of Health, or Research to Prevent Blindness.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Estimated 10-year incidence of impaired contrast sensitivity by age and generation, adjusted for sex
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ford ES, Roger VL, Dunlay SM, Go AS, Rosamond WD. Challenges of Ascertaining National Trends in the Incidence of Coronary Heart Disease in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e001097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aparicio HJ, Himali JJ, Satizabal CL et al. Temporal Trends in Ischemic Stroke Incidence in Younger Adults in the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2019; May 14:STROKEAHA119025171 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Satizabal CL, Beiser AS, Chouraki V, Chêne G, Dufouil C, Seshadri S. Incidence of Dementia over Three Decades in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:523–532. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhan W, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BEK, et al. Generational Differences in the Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in Older Adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171:260–266. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Johnson LJ, et al. Generational Differences in the 5-Year Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(12):1417–1423. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types