Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;32(3):271-286.
doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.03.01.

Current status of esophageal cancer treatment

Affiliations

Current status of esophageal cancer treatment

Tania Triantafyllou et al. Chin J Cancer Res. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Esophageal cancer (EC) remains one of the most common and aggressive diseases worldwide. This review discusses some debates in the modern management of the disease. Endoscopic procedures for early cancer (T1a-b) are now embedded in routine care and the challenge will be to more accurately select patients for endoscopic resection with or without adjuvant therapy. Perioperative multimodal therapies are associated with improved survival compared to surgery alone for locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, there is no global consensus on the optimal regimen. Furthermore, histological subtype (adenocarcinomavs. squamous cell cancer) plays a role in the choice for treatment. New studies are underway to resolve some issues. The extent of the lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy remains controversial especially after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The ideal operation balances between limiting surgical trauma and optimizing survival. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and enhanced recovery pathways are associated with decreased morbidity and faster recovery albeit there is no consensus yet what approach should be used. Finally, immune checkpoint inhibitors present promising preliminary results in the novel treatment of advanced or metastatic EC but their widespread application in clinical practice is still awaited.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; endoscopic resection; fast-track protocols; minimally invasive esophagectomy; multimodal treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–13. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02570-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022343. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tian J, Zuo C, Liu G, et al Cumulative evidence for relationship between body mass index and risk of esophageal cancer: an updated meta-analysis with evidence from 25 observational studies. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;35:730–43. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14917. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration Investigators Recommendations for clinical staging (cTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:913–9. doi: 10.1111/dote.12540. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources