A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Fractional CO2Laser, Microneedling and Platelet Rich Plasma in Post-Acne Scarring
- PMID: 32695692
- PMCID: PMC7367586
- DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_370_19
A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Fractional CO2Laser, Microneedling and Platelet Rich Plasma in Post-Acne Scarring
Abstract
Background: Acne scarring commonly seen in young adults causes marked psychological distress. Commonly used procedural treatments for post-acne scarring have limited efficacy. This prospective, randomized study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects offractional CO2 laser, microneedling, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in post-acne scarring.
Materials and methods: Sixty clinically diagnosed cases of post-acne scarring of both sexes were enrolled and divided into three groups of 20 patients each. The severity of scarring was graded as per the qualitative and quantitative grading system proposed by Goodman and Baron. Group A, B, and C patients were treated with fractional CO2 laser, microneedling, and PRP,respectively, at monthly intervals for foursessions. Improve men tin quantitative and qualitative grades of scars and adverse effects were noted at each session and 1 month after the final sitting. Statistical analysis was done using Student 't' test for quantitative values and Chi square test for qualitative values.
Results: At the end of foursessions, based on mean percentage of improvement in quantitative grade, the efficacy of fractional CO2 laser is significantly greater than that of PRP (P = 0.00), while CO2 laser and microneedling did not show significant difference (P = 0.106). Based on qualitative scores, fractional CO2 laser group showed statistically higher therapeutic efficacy compared to microneedling and PRP (P = 0.00).No significant adverse effects were encountered in any groups.
Conclusion: Fractional CO2 laser resurfacing is more efficacious than microneedling and PRP. Unsatisfactory results were obtained with PRP as monotherapy in post-acne scarring.
Keywords: Fractional CO2 laser; microneedling; platelet-rich plasma; post acne scaring.
Copyright: © 2020 Indian Dermatology Online Journal.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Layton AM, Eady EA, Zouboulis CC. Acne. In: Griffiths C, Barker J, Bleiker T, Chalmers R, Creamer D, editors. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology. 9th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2016. pp. 901–65.
-
- Vaishampayan S, Baveja S, Garg S. Acne, Rosacea and perioral dermatitis. In: Sacchidan S, Oberai C, Inamdar AC, editors. IADVL Text Book of Dermatology. 4rd ed. Mumbai: Bhalani Publishing House; 2015. pp. 1365–412.
-
- Leyden JJ. Understanding and reducing the risk for acne scarring. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2015;34:S89–91. - PubMed
-
- Hayashi N, Miyachi Y, Kawashima M. Prevalence of scars and AND “mini-scars” AND, and their impact on quality of life in Japanese patients with acne. J Dermatol. 2015;42:690–6. - PubMed
-
- Tan J, Kang S, Leyden J. Prevalence and risk factors of acne scarring among patients consulting dermatologists in the Unites States. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16:97–102. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials