Who can safely evade a magnetic resonance imaging fusion-targeted biopsy (MRIFTB) for prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3 lesion?
- PMID: 32696126
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03352-3
Who can safely evade a magnetic resonance imaging fusion-targeted biopsy (MRIFTB) for prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3 lesion?
Abstract
Objective: To identify patients who can safely evade the magnetic resonance imaging fusion-targeted biopsy (MRIFTB) for prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3 lesion.
Materials and methods: Overall, 755 men with PI-RADS 3-5 lesions who underwent MRIFTB were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine significant predictors for clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa), defined as Gleason grade group ≥ II. Detection rates and negative predictive values of CSPCa were estimated according to various clinical settings.
Results: Median age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and PSA density of patients were 66.0 years, 7.39 ng/mL, and 0.19 ng/mL, respectively. Overall detection rates of CSPCa according to PI-RADS 3 (n = 347), 4 (n = 260), and 5 (n = 148) lesions were 15.0%, 30.4%, and 80.4%, respectively. The negative predictive value (NPV) of PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI was 15.0%. On multivariate analysis, age [≥ 65 years, odds ratio (OR) = 0.427], PSA density (≥ 0.20 ng/mL2, OR = 0.234), prior negative biopsy history (OR = 2.231), and PI-RADS score (4, OR = 0.427; 5, OR = 0.071) were independent predictors for the absence of CSPCa by MRIFTB. When assessed according to various conditions, NPVs of PI-RADS 3 lesions were relatively high in subgroups with low PSA density (< 0.20 ng/mL2) regardless of age or prior biopsy history (NPV range 91.1-91.9%). Contrarily, NPVs in subgroups with high PSA density were relatively low and varied according to age or prior biopsy history groups (NPV range 50.0-86.8%).
Conclusions: Men with the PI-RADS 3 lesion and low PSA density might safely evade the MRIFTB, regardless of age or prior biopsy history.
Keywords: Biopsy; Detection; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Screening.
References
-
- Jhaveri FM, Klein EA, Kupelian PA, Zippe C, Levin HS (1999) Declining rates of extracapsular extension after radical prostatectomy: evidence for continued stage migration. J Clin Oncol 17:3167–3172 - DOI
-
- Derweesh IH, Kupelian PA, Zippe C, Levin HS, Brainard J, Magi-Galluzzi C et al (2004) Continuing trends in pathological stage migration in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Oncol 22:300–306 - DOI
-
- Loeb S, Bjurlin MA, Nicholson J, Tammela TL, Penson DF, Carter HB et al (2014) Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 65:1046–1055 - DOI
-
- Ahmed HU, Bosaily AE-S, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822 - DOI
-
- Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. New Eng J Med 378:1767–1777 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
