Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Nov 1:276:260-266.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.066. Epub 2020 Jul 18.

Antidepressant effects of ketamine and ECT: A pilot comparison

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Antidepressant effects of ketamine and ECT: A pilot comparison

Ravi K Sharma et al. J Affect Disord. .

Abstract

Background: To compare the antidepressant effects and cognitive adverse effects of intravenous ketamine infusion and Electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) in persons with severe depressive episodes.

Methods: This assessor-blinded randomized control trial included 25 patients (either sex; 18-65 years) meeting ICD-10 criteria for severe depression (bipolar or unipolar). Patients received either ECT (n = 13) or intravenous infusions of ketamine hydrochloride (0.5 mg/kg over 45 min; n = 12) for six alternate day sessions over a period of two weeks. Severity of depression was assessed at baseline and on every alternate day of intervention using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and self-reported Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

Results: Baseline socio-demographic and clinical variables including HDRS (ECT: 25.15±6.58; Ketamine: 23.33±4.05, p = 0.418) and BDI (ECT: 37.07±6.58; Ketamine: 33.33±9.29; p = 0.254) were comparable. Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that ECT patients showed significantly greater reduction in HDRS (group*time interaction effect; F = 4.79; p<0.001) and BDI scores (group*time interaction effect; F = 3.83; p<0.01). ECT patients had higher response rate than ketamine patients [HDRS: ECT- 13/13(100%) vs ketamine- 8/12 (66.70%); p = 0.04]. This was true for remission as well [ECT- 12/13(92.30%) vs ketamine- 6/12(50%), p = 0.030; both HDRS and BDI]. Performance on Digit Symbol Substitution Test (as part of the Battery for ECT-Related Cognitive Deficits scale) significantly improved in ketamine patients (p = 0.02) while that in ECT patients worsened non significantly (p = 0.30).

Limitations: Relatively small sample size; higher proportion of dropouts in the Ketamine arm.

Conclusion: This study favoured ECT over ketamine for a better efficacy over six treatment sessions in severe depression. The results need to be replicated in larger studies.

Trial registration: CTRI/2019/09/021184.

Keywords: Depressive disorder; Electro-convulsive therapy; Ketamine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources