Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;22(1):37-49.
doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/jfoucher.

Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard phenotypes of endogenous psychoses: a review of their validity

Affiliations
Review

Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard phenotypes of endogenous psychoses: a review of their validity

Jack R Foucher et al. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

While the ICD-DSM paradigm has been a major advance in clinical psychiatry, its usefulness for biological psychiatry is debated. By defining consensus-based disorders rather than empirically driven phenotypes, consensus classifications were not an implementation of the biomedical paradigm. In the field of endogenous psychoses, the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard (WKL) pathway has optimized the descriptions of 35 major phenotypes using common medical heuristics on lifelong diachronic observations. Regarding their construct validity, WKL phenotypes have good reliability and predictive and face validity. WKL phenotypes come with remarkable evidence for differential validity on age of onset, familiality, pregnancy complications, precipitating factors, and treatment response. Most impressive is the replicated separation of high- and low-familiality phenotypes. Created in the purest tradition of the biomedical paradigm, the WKL phenotypes deserve to be contrasted as credible alternatives with other approaches currently under discussion. .

Mettre la traduction ES.

Mettre la traduction FR.

Keywords: endogenous psychosis; Kleist; Leonhard; Wernicke; affect laden paraphrenia; bipolar; cataphasia; catatonia; classification; cycloid psychoses; deep phenotyping; epistemology; hebephrenia; periodic catatonia; phenotype; schizophrenia; supersensitivity psychosis; system schizophrenia; unipolar.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kupfer DJ, First MB, Regier DA, Kupfer DJ, First MB, Regier DA. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2002. Introduction A Research Agenda for DSM-V pp. xviii–xix.
    1. Foucher J-R, Bennouna Greene V. La CIM et le DSM ou l’impossible validation : pourquoi le ver est dans le fruit. Ann Médico-psychologiques, Rev Psychiatr. 2010;168(8):609–615.
    1. Friedman RA. Grief, depression, and the DSM-5. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(20):1855–1857. - PubMed
    1. Foucher JR, et al Bases épistémologiques de la recherche sur les psychoses. Quelle solution pour le choc des cadres paradigmatiques ? Ann Med Psychol. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.amp.2018. 10.022. - DOI
    1. Boorse C. Health as a theoretical concept. Philos Sci. 1977;44(4):542–573.

MeSH terms