Standardized Data Structures in Rare Diseases: CDISC User Guides for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Huntington's Disease
- PMID: 32702147
- PMCID: PMC7877853
- DOI: 10.1111/cts.12845
Standardized Data Structures in Rare Diseases: CDISC User Guides for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Huntington's Disease
Abstract
Interest in drug development for rare diseases has expanded dramatically since the Orphan Drug Act was passed in 1983, with 40% of new drug approvals in 2019 targeting orphan indications. However, limited quantitative understanding of natural history and disease progression hinders progress and increases the risks associated with rare disease drug development. Use of international data standards can assist in data harmonization and enable data exchange, integration into larger datasets, and a quantitative understanding of disease natural history. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires the use of Clinical Data Interchange Consortium (CDISC) Standards in new drug submissions to help the agency efficiently and effectively receive, process, review, and archive submissions, as well as to help integrate data to answer research questions. Such databases have been at the core of biomarker qualification efforts and fit-for-purpose models endorsed by the regulators. We describe the development of CDISC therapeutic area user guides for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and Huntington's disease through Critical Path Institute consortia. These guides describe formalized data structures and controlled terminology to map and integrate data from different sources. This will result in increased standardization of data collection and allow integration and comparison of data from multiple studies. Integration of multiple data sets enables a quantitative understanding of disease progression, which can help overcome common challenges in clinical trial design in these and other rare diseases. Ultimately, clinical data standardization will lead to a faster path to regulatory approval of urgently needed new therapies for patients.
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no competing interests for this work.
Figures
References
-
- Meier, T. , Perlman, S.L. , Rummey, C. , Coppard, N.J. & Lynch, D.R. Assessment of neurological efficacy of idebenone in pediatric patients with Friedreich’s ataxia: data from a 6‐month controlled study followed by a 12‐month open‐label extension study. J. Neurol. 259, 284–291 (2012). - PubMed
-
- Goemans, N. et al A randomized placebo‐controlled phase 3 trial of an antisense oligonucleotide, drisapersen. in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 28, 4–15 (2018). - PubMed
-
- McDonald, C.M. et al Ataluren in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (ACT DMD): a multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 390, 1489–1498 (2017). - PubMed
-
- Edaravone (MCI‐186) ALS 16 Study Group . A post‐hoc subgroup analysis of outcomes in the first phase III clinical study of edaravone (MCI‐186) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener. 18, 11–19 (2017). - PubMed
-
- Arnerić, S.P. , Kern, V.D. & Stephenson, D.T. Regulatory‐accepted drug development tools are needed to accelerate innovative CNS disease treatments. Biochem. Pharmacol. 151, 291–306 (2018). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical