Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;15(2):234-243.
doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0391. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

Implant-Associated Infection of Long-Segment Spinal Instrumentation: A Retrospective Analysis of 46 Consecutive Patients

Affiliations

Implant-Associated Infection of Long-Segment Spinal Instrumentation: A Retrospective Analysis of 46 Consecutive Patients

Stavros Oikonomidis et al. Asian Spine J. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Study design: This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients with an implant-associated infection of spinal instrumentation (four or more segments) treated between 2010 and 2018.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the treatment of implant-associated infections of long-segment spinal instrumentation and to define risk factors for implant removal.

Overview of literature: Implant-associated infection occurs in 0.7%-20% of spinal instrumentation. Significant blood loss, delayed reoperation, and use of effective antibiotics are reported risk factors for implant removal.

Methods: Patients with superficial infections not involving the implant were excluded. All patients received surgical and antibiotic treatments according to our interdisciplinary osteomyelitis board protocol. An infection was considered healed if a patient showed no signs of infection 1 year after termination of treatment. The patients were divided into an implant retention group and implant removal group, and their clinical and microbiological data were compared.

Results: Forty-six patients (27 women, 19 men) with an implant-associated infection of long-segment spinal instrumentation and mean age of 65.3±14.3 years (range, 22-89 years) were included. The mean length of the infected instrumentation was 6.5±2.4 segments (range, 4-13 segments). Implant retention was possible in 21 patients (45.7%); in the other 25 patients (54.3%), a part of or the entire implant required removal. Late infections were associated with implant removal, which correlated with longer hospitalization. Both groups showed high postoperative complication rates (50%) and high mortality rates (8.7%). In 39 patients (84.8%), infection was eradicated at a mean follow-up of 18.9±11.1 months (range, 12-60 months). Three patients (6.5%) were lost to follow-up.

Conclusions: Implant-associated infections of long-segment spinal instrumentations are associated with high complication and mortality rates. Late infections are associated with implant removal. Treatment should be interdisciplinary including orthopedic surgeons and clinical infectiologists.

Keywords: Deep surgical site infection; Implant-associated infection; Long-segmental spinal instrumentation; Spinal infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Radiological examination (X-ray) of the lumbar spine in the anterior-posterior and lateral views in standing position of a patient receiving implant removal but no re-instrumentation due to an implant-associated infection. (A, B) Anterior-posterior and lateral views are the preoperative radiological examinations and demonstrate noticeable pedicle screw loosening. (C) and (D) show radiological examinations directly after implant removal, showing no significant loss of the sagittal or coronal balance. (E) and (F) demonstrate the radiological examinations during the follow-up examination (15 months after implant removal). No significant loss of the sagittal or coronal balance compared with the pre- and directly postoperative radiological examinations could be identified.

References

    1. Kasliwal MK, Tan LA, Traynelis VC. Infection with spinal instrumentation: review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4(Suppl 5):S392–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaichana KL, Bydon M, Santiago-Dieppa DR, et al. Risk of infection following posterior instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease in 817 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:45–52. - PubMed
    1. Fang A, Hu SS, Endres N, Bradford DS. Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1460–5. - PubMed
    1. Liu JM, Deng HL, Chen XY, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018;43:732–7. - PubMed
    1. Viola RW, King HA, Adler SM, Wilson CB. Delayed infection after elective spinal instrumentation and fusion: a retrospective analysis of eight cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2444–50. - PubMed