Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 9;3(4):1502-1512.
doi: 10.1093/tas/txz120. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Influence of weaning date and late gestation supplementation on beef system productivity II: economic analysis

Affiliations

Influence of weaning date and late gestation supplementation on beef system productivity II: economic analysis

Kelsey M Luebbe et al. Transl Anim Sci. .

Abstract

Cow-calf production systems were analyzed using experimental data and historical economic information to model four separate production year using the 10-yr price period from 2005 to 2014. Treatments included two weaning dates, October (OCT) and December (DEC), and four winter nutritional treatments, grazing winter range with no supplement (WR0), low supplement (WR1), high supplement (WR2); or grazing corn residue with no supplement (CR) applied in a 2 × 4 factorial arrangement. Net returns at the December weaning date were greatest (P < 0.05) for DEC systems where cows were fed the WR2 level ($151.14/cow) or CR ($140.17/cow), intermediate for cows fed the WR1 ($110.44/cow), and least for cows fed WR0 ($62.23/cow). Average net returns across winter nutrition treatments at the December weaning date were greater (P < 0.01) for DEC systems ($115.99/cow) compared with OCT systems ($110.28/cow). Marketing October weaned calves in December increased net returns on average by $47.24/cow compared with October marketing. Retained and owned (RO) slaughter steer net returns sold on a hot carcass weight (HCW) basis were greatest (P < 0.05) for CR systems ($190.62/cow) or WR2 ($188.13/cow), intermediate for WR1 ($132.67/cow) and least for the WR0 ($68.08/cow) treatment. In general, purchasing weaned calves (PC) and marketing them as finished steers either on a HCW basis or on a marketing grid were not profitable. The WR2 and the CR grazing regimes were more profitable than WR0 and WR1 regardless of market end point, primarily due to reduction in replacement and production loss costs.

Keywords: beef cattle; economic analysis; supplementation; weaning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Forty-eight production scenarios shown were analyzed using production data from Luebbe et al. (2019). Treatments applied to the March-calving cows in that study included weaning their progeny in October or December and one of four winter nutritional treatments applied during late gestation (December 1 to February 28). Treatments included range without supplement (WR0), winter range with 0.45 kg DM/d 32% CP supplement (WR1), winter range with 0.91 kg DM/d 32% CP supplement (WR2), or corn residue without supplement (CR). In Table 1, results from 2 sale end points using both steer and heifer progeny were evaluated: sell calves in October (Oct sell), or sell calves in December (Dec sell). In Table 2, results from sale end points that used only the steer progeny and feeding until slaughter. Steers were marketed either on a HCW basis or a grid-priced (GP) basis. In addition, the HCW and GP marketing was analyzed for both a retained ownership (RO) scenario and a purchased at December weaning (PC) scenario.

References

    1. Baquet A. E. 2000. Partial budgeting, Vol. 925 Montana State Univ. Cooperative Ext. System, CL; 1–4
    1. Griffin W. A., Stalker L. A., Stockton M. C., Adams D. C., Funston R. N., and Klopfenstein T. J.. . 2012. Calving date and wintering system effects on cow and calf performance II: economic analysis. Prof. Anim. Sci. 28:260–271. doi:10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30355-7
    1. Jansen J., and Wilson R.. . 2015. Nebraska farm real estate market highlights 2014–2015 Department of Agriculture Economics Report, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska; [accessed September 29, 2015].http://agecon.unl.edu/documents/2369805/10452540/2015+ Nebraska+Farm+Rea....
    1. Luebbe K. M., Stalker L. A., Klopfenstein T. J., and Funston R. N.. . 2019. Influence of weaning date and late gestation supplementation on beef system productivity I: animal performance. Transl. Anim. Sci. in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. NRC 2016. National research council revised eighth edition of the Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.

LinkOut - more resources