Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;63(10):2158-2168.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05229-x. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

Type 1 diabetes in Africa: an immunogenetic study in the Amhara of North-West Ethiopia

Affiliations

Type 1 diabetes in Africa: an immunogenetic study in the Amhara of North-West Ethiopia

Shitaye A Balcha et al. Diabetologia. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: We aimed to characterise the immunogenic background of insulin-dependent diabetes in a resource-poor rural African community. The study was initiated because reports of low autoantibody prevalence and phenotypic differences from European-origin cases with type 1 diabetes have raised doubts as to the role of autoimmunity in this and similar populations.

Methods: A study of consecutive, unselected cases of recently diagnosed, insulin-dependent diabetes (n = 236, ≤35 years) and control participants (n = 200) was carried out in the ethnic Amhara of rural North-West Ethiopia. We assessed their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, and measured non-fasting C-peptide, diabetes-associated autoantibodies and HLA-DRB1 alleles. Leveraging genome-wide genotyping, we performed both a principal component analysis and, given the relatively modest sample size, a provisional genome-wide association study. Type 1 diabetes genetic risk scores were calculated to compare their genetic background with known European type 1 diabetes determinants.

Results: Patients presented with stunted growth and low BMI, and were insulin sensitive; only 15.3% had diabetes onset at ≤15 years. C-peptide levels were low but not absent. With clinical diabetes onset at ≤15, 16-25 and 26-35 years, 86.1%, 59.7% and 50.0% were autoantibody positive, respectively. Most had autoantibodies to GAD (GADA) as a single antibody; the prevalence of positivity for autoantibodies to IA-2 (IA-2A) and ZnT8 (ZnT8A) was low in all age groups. Principal component analysis showed that the Amhara genomes were distinct from modern European and other African genomes. HLA-DRB1*03:01 (p = 0.0014) and HLA-DRB1*04 (p = 0.0001) were positively associated with this form of diabetes, while HLA-DRB1*15 was protective (p < 0.0001). The mean type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (derived from European data) was higher in patients than control participants (p = 1.60 × 10-7). Interestingly, despite the modest sample size, autoantibody-positive patients revealed evidence of association with SNPs in the well-characterised MHC region, already known to explain half of type 1 diabetes heritability in Europeans.

Conclusions/interpretation: The majority of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes in rural North-West Ethiopia have the immunogenetic characteristics of autoimmune type 1 diabetes. Phenotypic differences between type 1 diabetes in rural North-West Ethiopia and the industrialised world remain unexplained.

Keywords: Africa; Autoantibodies; Ethiopia; Genomes; HLA; Rural; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PC analysis. (a) The first two PCs (PCs 1 and 2). (b) The second and third PCs (PCs 2 and 3). These are based on genome-wide genotypes of the Ethiopian (Amhara) participants compared with 1000 Genomes ancestral groups. AFR, African; AMR, Americas. EAS, East Asian. ETP, Ethiopian; EUR, European; SAS, Southeast Asian
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Box and whisker plot showing GRS for type 1 diabetes. The GRS was calculated using 19 established type 1 diabetes-associated SNPs of European background; variants, risk alleles and weights are listed in ESM Table 1 (see the Methods/Statistical analysis section for details). Diabetic patients were compared with control participants: autoantibody-positive cases (AA+) (n = 121, vs controls, p = 1.54 × 10−9), all cases (n = 187, vs controls, p = 1.6 × 10−7), autoantibody-negative cases (AA) (n = 66, vs controls, p = NS) and control participants (n = 137). The vertical lines denote the maximum and minimum values

References

    1. Balcha SA, Phillips DIW, Trimble ER. Type 1 diabetes in a resource-poor setting: malnutrition related, malnutrition modified, or just diabetes? Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18:47. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1003-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asanghanwa M, Gorus FK, Weets I, et al. Clinical and biological characteristics of diabetic patients under age 40 in Cameroon: relation to autoantibody status and comparison with Belgian patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103:97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fekadu S, Yigzaw M, Alemu S, et al. Insulin-requiring diabetes in Ethiopia: associations with poverty, early undernutrition and anthropometric disproportion. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:1192–1198. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alemu S, Dessie A, Seid E, et al. Insulin-requiring diabetes in rural Ethiopia: should we reopen the case for malnutrition-related diabetes? Diabetologia. 2009;52:1842–1845. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1433-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panz VR, Kalk WJ, Zouvanis M, Joffe BI. Distribution of autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase across the spectrum of diabetes mellitus seen in South Africa. Diabet Med. 2000;17:524–527. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00324.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types