Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;11(8):1183-1189.
doi: 10.1177/2192568220941453. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

Hybrid Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Short-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Readmissions

Affiliations

Hybrid Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Short-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Readmissions

Venkat Boddapati et al. Global Spine J. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: Although cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become a well-established and effective treatment for symptomatic cervical degeneration, many patients with multilevel disease are not good candidates for CDA at all levels. For such patients, hybrid surgery (HS)-a combination of adjacent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and CDA-may be more appropriate. Given the novelty of HS and the relative dearth of studies adequately assessing short-term perioperative complications, this current study sought to assess the short-term morbidity profile of HS, differences in operative duration, length of stay (LOS), and readmission and reoperation rates and reasons relative to a 2-level ACDF cohort.

Methods: All patients who underwent HS and 2-level ACDF were identified between 2011 and 2018 using a large, prospectively collected registry. Baseline patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared using bivariate and/or multivariate analysis.

Results: A total of 390 patients undergoing HS were identified. Two-level procedures were the most common (74.9%). Patients undergoing HS were more likely to be younger, male, and have fewer comorbidities. There were no differences between HS and 2-level ACDF in rates of any postoperative complication, transfusion, readmissions, and operative duration. However, HS had a decreased LOS (0.5 days), relative to a 2-level ACDF. HS patients had low rates of reoperation (1.28%) with 1 case for hematoma evacuation and another for revision CDA.

Conclusions: This study represents one of the largest cohorts of patients undergoing HS reported to date. Patients undergoing HS are not at increased risk of perioperative complications relative to a 2-level ACDF and may benefit from shorter LOS.

Keywords: ACDF; CDA; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; cervical disc arthroplasty; cervical spine; complications; hybrid surgery; outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) diagram of included patients. ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; CDA, cervical disc arthroplasty; CPT, Current Procedural Terminology.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Sample hybrid construct radiographs of cervical disc arthroplasty adjacent to single- or multilevel cervical discectomy or corpectomy and fusions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Badhiwala JH, Platt A, Witiw CD, Traynelis VC. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up. J Spine Surg. 2020;6:217–232. doi:10.21037/jss.2019.12.09 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dong L, Xu Z, Chen X, et al.The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine J. 2017;17:1549–1558. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.010 - PubMed
    1. Gao F, Mao T, Sun W, et al.An updated meta-analysis comparing artificial cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1816–1823. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000001138 - PubMed
    1. Segal DN, Wilson JM, Staley C, Yoon ST. Outpatient and inpatient single-level cervical total disc replacement: a comparison of 30-day outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44:79–83. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002739 - PubMed
    1. Shillingford J, Laratta J, Hardy N, et al.National outcomes following single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spine Surg. 2017;3:641–649. doi:10.21037/jss.2017.12.04 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources