Hybrid Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Short-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Readmissions
- PMID: 32705903
- PMCID: PMC8453682
- DOI: 10.1177/2192568220941453
Hybrid Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Short-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Readmissions
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objectives: Although cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become a well-established and effective treatment for symptomatic cervical degeneration, many patients with multilevel disease are not good candidates for CDA at all levels. For such patients, hybrid surgery (HS)-a combination of adjacent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and CDA-may be more appropriate. Given the novelty of HS and the relative dearth of studies adequately assessing short-term perioperative complications, this current study sought to assess the short-term morbidity profile of HS, differences in operative duration, length of stay (LOS), and readmission and reoperation rates and reasons relative to a 2-level ACDF cohort.
Methods: All patients who underwent HS and 2-level ACDF were identified between 2011 and 2018 using a large, prospectively collected registry. Baseline patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared using bivariate and/or multivariate analysis.
Results: A total of 390 patients undergoing HS were identified. Two-level procedures were the most common (74.9%). Patients undergoing HS were more likely to be younger, male, and have fewer comorbidities. There were no differences between HS and 2-level ACDF in rates of any postoperative complication, transfusion, readmissions, and operative duration. However, HS had a decreased LOS (0.5 days), relative to a 2-level ACDF. HS patients had low rates of reoperation (1.28%) with 1 case for hematoma evacuation and another for revision CDA.
Conclusions: This study represents one of the largest cohorts of patients undergoing HS reported to date. Patients undergoing HS are not at increased risk of perioperative complications relative to a 2-level ACDF and may benefit from shorter LOS.
Keywords: ACDF; CDA; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; cervical disc arthroplasty; cervical spine; complications; hybrid surgery; outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Hybrid surgery: a comparison of early postoperative outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty.J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Oct 29;36(4):575-584. doi: 10.3171/2021.7.SPINE21478. Print 2022 Apr 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021. PMID: 34715670
-
Mid-term outcomes of revision anterior fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty in patients with prior single-level anterior cervical fusion.Spine J. 2025 May 3:S1529-9430(25)00239-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.007. Online ahead of print. Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40324483
-
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28291414
-
The safety and efficacy of hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Feb;162(2):289-303. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04129-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020. PMID: 31848789
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27314663 Review.
Cited by
-
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Rationale, Designs, and Results of Randomized Controlled Trials.Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Feb 27;18(3):258-76. doi: 10.14444/8586. Online ahead of print. Int J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 38413235 Free PMC article.
-
Could the different surgical goals of fusion and non-fusion also be achieved in combination within the same patient? Clinical and radiological outcome of hybrid cervical spine surgery.Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2287-2297. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08204-x. Epub 2024 Mar 29. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38553584
-
No Difference in Two-Year Revisions Between Hybrid Fusion and Two-Level Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A National Database Study.Global Spine J. 2024 Apr;14(3):949-955. doi: 10.1177/21925682221131548. Epub 2022 Oct 19. Global Spine J. 2024. PMID: 36259613 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical effects of hybrid constructions in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical spondylopathy: a finite element analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03537-7. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36658557 Free PMC article.
-
Presentation and management of infection in total disc replacement: A review.N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Mar 6;18:100320. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100320. eCollection 2024 Jun. N Am Spine Soc J. 2024. PMID: 38590972 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dong L, Xu Z, Chen X, et al.The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine J. 2017;17:1549–1558. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.010 - PubMed
-
- Gao F, Mao T, Sun W, et al.An updated meta-analysis comparing artificial cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1816–1823. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000001138 - PubMed
-
- Segal DN, Wilson JM, Staley C, Yoon ST. Outpatient and inpatient single-level cervical total disc replacement: a comparison of 30-day outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44:79–83. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002739 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources