Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;202(2):210-219.
doi: 10.1111/cei.13500. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

Characteristics and roles of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibodies in patients with different severities of coronavirus 19

Affiliations

Characteristics and roles of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibodies in patients with different severities of coronavirus 19

Z Huang et al. Clin Exp Immunol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

The diagnosis of coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) relies mainly upon viral nucleic acid detection, but false negatives can lead to missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific antibody detection is convenient, safe and highly sensitive. Immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG are commonly used to serologically diagnose COVID-19; however, the role of IgA is not well known. We aimed to quantify the levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM, IgA and IgG antibodies, identify changes in them based on COVID-19 severity, and establish the significance of combined antibody detection. COVID-19 patients, divided into a severe and critical group and a moderate group, and non-COVID-19 patients with respiratory disease were included in this study. A chemiluminescence method was used to detect the levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM, IgA and IgG in the blood samples from the three groups. Epidemiological characteristics, symptoms, blood test results and other data were recorded for all patients. Compared to the traditional IgM-IgG combined antibodies, IgA-IgG combined antibodies are more effective for diagnosing COVID-19. During the disease process, IgA appeared first and disappeared last. All three antibodies had significantly higher levels in COVID-19 patients than in non-COVID-19 patients. IgA and IgG were also higher for severe and critical disease than for moderate disease. All antibodies were at or near low levels at the time of tracheal extubation in critical patients. Detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific combined IgA-IgG antibodies is advantageous in diagnosing COVID-19. IgA detection is suitable during early and late stages of the disease. IgA and IgG levels correspond to disease severity.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; diagnosis; severity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatter diagram of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2)‐specific immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG and IgM antibodies. Both minimum positive relative luminescence values are 1·0; 218 serum samples from 19 severe and critical coronavirus 19 (COVID‐19) patients, 81 serum samples from 24 moderate COVID‐19 patients and 61 serum samples from non‐COVID‐19 patients were used.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dynamic changes of immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG and IgM antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). Solid dots represent each patient in each time period, while rectangles represent the median values in the corresponding periods. Lines show the changing trends with onset of time. Green markers indicate moderate coronavirus 19 (COVID‐19) patients, while red markers indicate severe and critical COVID‐19 patients.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution difference of immunoglobulin (Ig)A, IgG and IgM between coronavirus 19 (COVID‐19) and non‐COVID‐19 groups.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Tracheal extubation and antibody levels in critical coronavirus 19 (COVID‐19) patients. The curve of each patient was divided into two parts based on the time of tracheal extubation.

References

    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W et al A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:727–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu R, Han H, Liu F et al Positive rate of RT–PCR detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in 4880 cases from one hospital in Wuhan, China, from Jan to Feb 2020. Clin Chim Acta 2020; 505:172–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Y, Kang H, Liu X, Tong Z. Combination of RT–qPCR testing and clinical features for diagnosis of COVID‐19 facilitates management of SARS‐CoV‐2 outbreak. J Med Virol 2020; 92:538–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guo L, Ren L, Yang S et al Profiling early humoral response to diagnose novel coronavirus disease (COVID‐19). Clin Infect Dis 2020. 10.1093/cid/ciaa310 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao J, Yuan Q, Wang H et al Antibody responses to SARS‐CoV‐2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis 2020. 10.1093/cid/ciaa344 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms