Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population
- PMID: 32707037
- PMCID: PMC7373389
- DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4
Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population
Abstract
Background: The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on population mental health is of increasing global concern. We examine changes in adult mental health in the UK population before and during the lockdown.
Methods: In this secondary analysis of a national, longitudinal cohort study, households that took part in Waves 8 or 9 of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) panel, including all members aged 16 or older in April, 2020, were invited to complete the COVID-19 web survey on April 23-30, 2020. Participants who were unable to make an informed decision as a result of incapacity, or who had unknown postal addresses or addresses abroad were excluded. Mental health was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Repeated cross-sectional analyses were done to examine temporal trends. Fixed-effects regression models were fitted to identify within-person change compared with preceding trends.
Findings: Waves 6-9 of the UKHLS had 53 351 participants. Eligible participants for the COVID-19 web survey were from households that took part in Waves 8 or 9, and 17 452 (41·2%) of 42 330 eligible people participated in the web survey. Population prevalence of clinically significant levels of mental distress rose from 18·9% (95% CI 17·8-20·0) in 2018-19 to 27·3% (26·3-28·2) in April, 2020, one month into UK lockdown. Mean GHQ-12 score also increased over this time, from 11·5 (95% CI 11·3-11·6) in 2018-19, to 12·6 (12·5-12·8) in April, 2020. This was 0·48 (95% CI 0·07-0·90) points higher than expected when accounting for previous upward trends between 2014 and 2018. Comparing GHQ-12 scores within individuals, adjusting for time trends and significant predictors of change, increases were greatest in 18-24-year-olds (2·69 points, 95% CI 1·89-3·48), 25-34-year-olds (1·57, 0·96-2·18), women (0·92, 0·50-1·35), and people living with young children (1·45, 0·79-2·12). People employed before the pandemic also averaged a notable increase in GHQ-12 score (0·63, 95% CI 0·20-1·06).
Interpretation: By late April, 2020, mental health in the UK had deteriorated compared with pre-COVID-19 trends. Policies emphasising the needs of women, young people, and those with preschool aged children are likely to play an important part in preventing future mental illness.
Funding: None.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures

Comment in
-
COVID-19: from a PHEIC to a public mental health crisis?Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e414. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30165-1. Epub 2020 Jul 23. Lancet Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32711683 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Panel sampling in health research.Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):840-841. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30358-8. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32949513 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Resilience and Coping With COVID-19: The COPERS Study.Int J Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;66:1604007. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604007. eCollection 2021. Int J Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34335143 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Joyce R, Xu X. The Institute for Fiscal Studies; London: 2020. Sector shutdowns during the coronavirus crisis: which workers are most exposed? IFS Briefing Note.
-
- Office for National Statistics Coronavirus and the social impacts on Great Britain. 2020. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/...
-
- WHO Mental health and psychosocial considerations during COVID-19 outbreak. 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/mental-health-consi...
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous