Genetic Consequences of the Transatlantic Slave Trade in the Americas
- PMID: 32707084
- PMCID: PMC7413858
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.06.012
Genetic Consequences of the Transatlantic Slave Trade in the Americas
Abstract
According to historical records of transatlantic slavery, traders forcibly deported an estimated 12.5 million people from ports along the Atlantic coastline of Africa between the 16th and 19th centuries, with global impacts reaching to the present day, more than a century and a half after slavery's abolition. Such records have fueled a broad understanding of the forced migration from Africa to the Americas yet remain underexplored in concert with genetic data. Here, we analyzed genotype array data from 50,281 research participants, which-combined with historical shipping documents-illustrate that the current genetic landscape of the Americas is largely concordant with expectations derived from documentation of slave voyages. For instance, genetic connections between people in slave trading regions of Africa and disembarkation regions of the Americas generally mirror the proportion of individuals forcibly moved between those regions. While some discordances can be explained by additional records of deportations within the Americas, other discordances yield insights into variable survival rates and timing of arrival of enslaved people from specific regions of Africa. Furthermore, the greater contribution of African women to the gene pool compared to African men varies across the Americas, consistent with literature documenting regional differences in slavery practices. This investigation of the transatlantic slave trade, which is broad in scope in terms of both datasets and analyses, establishes genetic links between individuals in the Americas and populations across Atlantic Africa, yielding a more comprehensive understanding of the African roots of peoples of the Americas.
Keywords: Africa; Americas; admixture; ancestry; genetics; history; identity by descent; migration; population genetics; slave trade.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
S.J.M., K.B., S.G.A.E., W.A.F., M.E.M., G.D.P., A.J.S., J.L.M., and members of the 23andMe Research Team are employees of and have stock, stock options, or both, in 23andMe. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Figures



Comment in
-
So many Nigerians: why is Nigeria overrepresented as the ancestral genetic homeland of Legacy African North Americans?Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Jan 7;108(1):202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Dec 14. Am J Hum Genet. 2021. PMID: 33321100 Free PMC article.
-
Response to Jackson.Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Jan 7;108(1):209-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Dec 14. Am J Hum Genet. 2021. PMID: 33321101 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Martins R.B. Growing in silence: the slave economy of nineteenth-century Minas Gerais, Brazil. J. Econ. Hist. 1982;42:222–223.
-
- Bethell L. Cambridge University Press; 2009. The Abolition of the Brazilian Slave Trade: Britain, Brazil and the Slave Trade Question.
-
- Eltis D. The volume and structure of the transatlantic slave trade: a reassessment. William Mary Q. 2001;58:17–46. - PubMed
-
- Heywood L.M., Thornton J.K. Cambridge University Press; 2007. Central Africans, Atlantic creoles, and the foundation of the Americas, 1585-1660.
-
- Eltis D. 2007. A brief overview of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade. Voyages: The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database 1700–1810.http://www.slavevoyages.org/assessment/essay
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources