Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 1;26(21):5701-5708.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1825. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

The Genomic Landscape of SMARCA4 Alterations and Associations with Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer

Affiliations

The Genomic Landscape of SMARCA4 Alterations and Associations with Outcomes in Patients with Lung Cancer

Adam J Schoenfeld et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: SMARCA4 mutations are among the most common recurrent alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the relationship to other genomic abnormalities and clinical impact has not been established.

Experimental design: To characterize SMARCA4 alterations in NSCLC, we analyzed the genomic, protein expression, and clinical outcome data of patients with SMARCA4 alterations treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering.

Results: In 4,813 tumors from patients with NSCLC, we identified 8% (n = 407) of patients with SMARCA4-mutant lung cancer. We describe two categories of SMARCA4 mutations: class 1 mutations (truncating mutations, fusions, and homozygous deletion) and class 2 mutations (missense mutations). Protein expression loss was associated with class 1 mutation (81% vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Both classes of mutation co-occurred more frequently with KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1 mutations compared with SMARCA4 wild-type tumors (P < 0.001). In patients with metastatic NSCLC, SMARCA4 alterations were associated with shorter overall survival, with class 1 alterations associated with shortest survival times (P < 0.001). Conversely, we found that treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was associated with improved outcomes in patients with SMARCA4-mutant tumors (P = 0.01), with class 1 mutations having the best response to ICIs (P = 0.027).

Conclusions: SMARCA4 alterations can be divided into two clinically relevant genomic classes associated with differential protein expression as well as distinct prognostic and treatment implications. Both classes co-occur with KEAP1, STK11, and KRAS mutations, but individually represent independent predictors of poor prognosis. Despite association with poor outcomes, SMARCA4-mutant lung cancers may be more sensitive to immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: AN was a consultant for Bayer MEA is a consultant for AstraZeneca and received support from Astrazeneca, Invivoscribe, and Raindance Technologies. JLS reports stock ownership in the following companies: Pfizer, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Inc., Merck & Co Inc and Chemed Corp. ML has received advisory board compensation from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Bayer, and research support from LOXO Oncology and Helsinn Healthcare. TJ is a member of the Board of Directors of Amgen and Thermo Fisher Scientific. He is also a co-Founder of Dragonfly Therapeutics and T2 Biosystems. T.J. serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Dragonfly Therapeutics, SQZ Biotech, and Skyhawk Therapeutics. None of these affiliations represent a conflict of interest with respect to the design or execution of this study or interpretation of data presented in this manuscript. T.J. laboratory currently also receives funding from the Johnson & Johnson Lung Cancer Initiative and The Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research, but this funding did not support the research described in this manuscript. CMR has consulted regarding oncology drug development with AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, AstraZeneca, Bicycle, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech/Roche, Ipsen, Jansen, Jazz, Lilly/Loxo, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Syros, and Vavotek; he serves on the SAB for Bridge Medicines and Harpoon Therapeutics. MDH receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb; has been a compensated consultant for Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Nektar, Syndax, Mirati, Shattuck Labs, Immunai, Blueprint Medicines, Achilles, and Arcus; received travel support/honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; has options from Shattuck Labs, Immunai, and Arcus; has a patent filed by his institution related to the use of tumor mutation burden to predict response to immunotherapy (PCT/US2015/062208), which has received licensing fees from PGDx. GJR Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center receives funding for research led by Dr. Riely from: Mirati, Merck, Takeda, Roche, Pfizer, and Novartis.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Spectrum of SMARCA4 alterations by class and association with SMARCA4 protein expression. (A) The distribution of Class 1 SMARCA4 alterations (n=212) and protein expression (n =62). (B) The distribution of Class 2 SMARCA4 alterations (n=95) and protein expression (n =24). Green QLQ, Gln, Leu, Gln motif; Red HSA, helicase/SANT-associated domain; Blue BRK, Brahma and Kismet domain; Yellow DEXDc, DEAD-like helicase superfamily domain; Purple SNF2_N, SNF2 family N-terminal domain; Orange HELICc, helicase superfamily C-terminal domain; Pink Bromo, bromodomain.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Genomic context of SMARCA4 alterations. (A) Most frequent co-occurring alterations by SMARCA4 alteration. (B) Distribution of SMARCA4 alteration by commonly altered gene subgroups in NSCLC. (C) Frequency of altered individual genes within SMARCA4 mutant vs SMARCA4 wildtype subgroups. Genes labeled red were associated with significantly differential PD-L1 expression (q value <0.10). (D) Distribution of SMARCA4, STK11, KRAS, and KEAP1 alterations within NSCLC cohort.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival by SMARCA4 alteration class. (A) Overall survival among all patients, with multivariate model (right). (B) Overall survival among patients with KRAS mutations, with multivariate model (right).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcomes. (A) Overall survival among patients with SMARCA4 alterations who did and did not receive ICIs. (B) Tumor mutational burden (TMB) by SMARCA4 alteration class. (C) PD-L1 expression frequency by SMARCA4 alteration class. (D) Overall response rate by SMARCA4 alteration class. (E) Progression-free survival by SMARCA4 alteration class. (F) Overall survival by SMARCA4 alteration class.

References

    1. Helming KC, Wang X, Roberts CWM. Vulnerabilities of mutant SWI/SNF complexes in cancer. Cancer cell 2014;26(3):309–17 doi 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.07.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kadoch C, Hargreaves DC, Hodges C, Elias L, Ho L, Ranish J, et al. Proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes identifies extensive roles in human malignancy. Nature genetics 2013;45(6):592–601 doi 10.1038/ng.2628. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abou Alaiwi S, Nassar AH, Xie W, Bakouny Z, Berchuck JE, Braun DA, et al. Mammalian SWI/SNF complex genomic alterations and immune checkpoint blockade in solid tumors. Cancer Immunology Research 2020:canimm.0866.2019 doi 10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-19-0866. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miao D, Margolis CA, Gao W, Voss MH, Li W, Martini DJ, et al. Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Science (New York, NY) 2018;359(6377):801–6 doi 10.1126/science.aan5951. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lovly CM, Gupta A, Lipson D, Otto G, Brennan T, Chung CT, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors harbor multiple potentially actionable kinase fusions. Cancer Discov 2014;4(8):889–95 doi 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0377. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms