Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders
- PMID: 32710772
- PMCID: PMC8059493
- DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa051
Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders
Abstract
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation has shown promising clinical results, leading to increased demand for an evidence-based review on its clinical effects.
Objective: We convened a team of transcranial direct current stimulation experts to conduct a systematic review of clinical trials with more than 1 session of stimulation testing: pain, Parkinson's disease motor function and cognition, stroke motor function and language, epilepsy, major depressive disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, Tourette syndrome, schizophrenia, and drug addiction.
Methods: Experts were asked to conduct this systematic review according to the search methodology from PRISMA guidelines. Recommendations on efficacy were categorized into Levels A (definitely effective), B (probably effective), C (possibly effective), or no recommendation. We assessed risk of bias for all included studies to confirm whether results were driven by potentially biased studies.
Results: Although most of the clinical trials have been designed as proof-of-concept trials, some of the indications analyzed in this review can be considered as definitely effective (Level A), such as depression, and probably effective (Level B), such as neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, migraine, post-operative patient-controlled analgesia and pain, Parkinson's disease (motor and cognition), stroke (motor), epilepsy, schizophrenia, and alcohol addiction. Assessment of bias showed that most of the studies had low risk of biases, and sensitivity analysis for bias did not change these results. Effect sizes vary from 0.01 to 0.70 and were significant in about 8 conditions, with the largest effect size being in postoperative acute pain and smaller in stroke motor recovery (nonsignificant when combined with robotic therapy).
Conclusion: All recommendations listed here are based on current published PubMed-indexed data. Despite high levels of evidence in some conditions, it must be underscored that effect sizes and duration of effects are often limited; thus, real clinical impact needs to be further determined with different study designs.
Keywords: clinical evidence; evidence-based medicine; neurological disorders; psychiatric disorders; tDCS.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.
References
-
- Achacheluee ST, Rahnama L, Karimi N, Abdollahi I, Arslan SA, Jaberzadeh S (2018) The effect of unihemispheric concurrent dual-site transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices on motor function in patients with sub-acute stroke. Front Hum Neurosci 12:441. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Alexander MP, Naeser MA, Palumbo C (1990) Broca’s area aphasias: aphasia after lesions including the frontal operculum. Neurology 40:353–362. - PubMed
-
- Andrade SM, de Brito Aranha REL, de Oliveira EA, de Mendonça CTPL, Martins WKN, Alves NT, Fernández-Calvo B (2017) Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor vs prefrontal cortex in refractory chronic migraine: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Sci 378:225–232. - PubMed
-
- Anon (2017) Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical