Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;28(6):849-854.
doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0097. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

Assessment of the conventional radial artery with optical coherent tomography after the snuffbox approach

Affiliations

Assessment of the conventional radial artery with optical coherent tomography after the snuffbox approach

Yongcheol Kim et al. Cardiol J. 2021.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate acute injuries of the radial artery (RA) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients who underwent coronary intervention via the snuffbox approach.

Methods: Forty-six patients, who underwent coronary intervention and assessment of the conventional RA using OCT via the snuffbox approach, were enrolled from two university hospitals between August 2018 and August 2019.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 65.1 years. In this study population, 6-French (Fr) sheaths were used. The mean diameter of the conventional RA was 2.89 ± 0.33 mm, and the mean lumen area of the conventional RA was 6.68 ± 1.56 mm2. Acute injuries of the conventional RA, after the snuffbox approach, were observed in 5 (10.9%) patients. Intimal tear was observed in the RA in 1 (2.2%) case. Intraluminal thrombi, without vessel injuries, were detected in the RA in 4 (8.7%) cases. However, medial dissection was not observed in the OCT analysis.

Conclusions: This retrospective OCT-based study showed that the diameter of the conventional RA was 2.89 mm and acute vessel injury of the conventional RA was rare in patients who underwent coronary intervention via the snuffbox approach.

Keywords: anatomical snuffbox; optical coherence tomography; radial artery occlusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 6-Fr sheath is inserted via the distal radial approach (A) and the conventional radial artery (RA) is assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT; B). (White dotted line: distal margin of the conventional RA).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Optical coherence tomography image of the conventional radial artery, showing an intimal tear (A, arrowheads), intraluminal thrombus (B, arrowheads; wire artifact — asterisk).

References

    1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;30(2):173–178. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810300220. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(2):349–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, et al. MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465–2476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119–177. - PubMed
    1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. - PubMed

MeSH terms