Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011677.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11677.

Assessment of Physician Priorities in Delivery of Preventive Care

Jessica J Zhang  1 , Michael B Rothberg  1   2 , Anita D Misra-Hebert  1   2   3 , Niyati M Gupta  2 , Glen B Taksler  1   2   3   4
Affiliations

Assessment of Physician Priorities in Delivery of Preventive Care

Jessica J Zhang et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Primary care physicians have limited time to discuss preventive care, but it is unknown how they prioritize recommended services.

Objective: To understand primary care physicians' prioritization of preventive services.

Design, setting, and participants: This online survey was administered to primary care physicians in a large health care system from March 17 to May 12, 2017. Physicians were asked whether they prioritize preventive services and which factors contribute to their choice (5-point Likert scale). Results were analyzed from July 8, 2017, to September 19, 2019.

Exposures: A 2 × 2 factorial design of 2 hypothetical patients: (1) a 50-year-old white woman with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of breast cancer; and (2) a 45-year-old black man with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a 30-pack-year history of smoking, and a family history of colorectal cancer. Two visit lengths (40 minutes vs 20 minutes) were given. Each patient was eligible for at least 11 preventive services.

Main outcomes and measures: Physicians rated their likelihood of discussing each service during the visit and reported their top 3 priorities for patients 1 and 2. Physician choices were compared with the preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy, using a previously published mathematical model.

Results: Of 241 physicians, 137 responded (57%), of whom 74 (54%) were female and 85 (62%) were younger than 50 years. Physicians agreed they prioritized preventive services (mean score, 4.27 [95% CI, 4.12-4.42] of 5.00), mostly by ability to improve quality (4.56 [95% CI, 4.44-4.68] of 5.00) or length (4.53 [95% CI, 4.40-4.66] of 5.00) of life. Physicians reported more prioritization in the 20- vs 40-minute visit, indicating that they were likely to discuss fewer services during the shorter visit (median, 5 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3-8] vs 11 [IQR, 9-13] preventive services for patient 1, and 4 [IQR, 3-6] vs 9 [IQR, 8-11] for patient 2). Physicians reported similar top 3 priorities for both patients: smoking cessation, hypertension control, and glycemic control for patient 1 and smoking cessation, hypertension control, and colorectal cancer screening for patient 2. Physicians' top 3 priorities did not usually include diet and exercise or weight loss (ranked in their top 3 recommendations for either patient by only 48 physicians [35%]), although these were among the 3 preventive services most likely to improve life expectancy based on the mathematical model.

Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study, physicians prioritized preventive services under time constraints, but priorities did not vary across patients. Physicians did not prioritize lifestyle interventions despite large potential benefits. Future research should consider whether physicians and patients would benefit from guidance on preventive care priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Rothberg reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging (NIA) during the conduct of the study. Dr Misra-Hebert reported receiving grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Novo Nordisk A/S, Boehringer Ingelheim and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute outside the submitted work. Dr Taksler reported receiving grants from the NIA and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (administered by Clinical & Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland) during the conduct of the study and personal fees from the University of Michigan for consulting on a grant funded by the AHRQ, outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Top 3 Preventive Recommendations to Address in the Current Visit
Recommendations were chosen by more than 5% of physicians.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Net Expected Effect of Each Preventive Recommendation on Life Expectancy Based on Prior Literature
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. USPSTF A and B Recommendations . February 2019. Accessed April 26, 2019. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/uspstf-a-and-b-r...
    1. Marshall IJ, Wolfe CDA, McKevitt C. Lay perspectives on hypertension and drug adherence: systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ. 2012;345:e3953. doi:10.1136/bmj.e3953 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aung E, Donald M, Coll J, Dower J, Williams GM, Doi SAR. The impact of concordant and discordant comorbidities on patient-assessed quality of diabetes care. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1621-1632. doi:10.1111/hex.12151 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piette JD, Kerr EA. The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(3):725-731. doi:10.2337/diacare.29.03.06.dc05-2078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerr EA, Heisler M, Krein SL, et al. . Beyond comorbidity counts: how do comorbidity type and severity influence diabetes patients’ treatment priorities and self-management? J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(12):1635-1640. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0313-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms