Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul-Sep;11(3):W1-W4.
doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1778130.

Neuroethics in the Shadow of a Pandemic

Affiliations

Neuroethics in the Shadow of a Pandemic

Adina L Roskies et al. AJOB Neurosci. 2020 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Neuroethics under the BRAIN Initiative has been focused upon both the neuroethical implications of basic advances in neuroscience, as well as the ethics attending the development of ever more powerful tools to both understand the brain and treat dysfunction. It has focused on health and disease in the context of the pre-pandemic status quo, essentially divorced from issues like infectious disease and large-scale disruption of social and economic structures. The questions animating the neuroethics of the BRAIN Initiative, on first glance, seemingly fail to intersect with the primary concerns of a post-Covid world, but careful consideration shows that they of course do. After all, the brain's job is to model and respond to the pressures of our environment, and the environment of virtually all of humanity has changed in a dramatic way, unprecedented since the rise of modern neuroscience. Here we consider ways in which neuroethics work aligned with the BRAIN Initiative can inform our response to the Covid crisis, as well as ways in which the pandemic may shape future work in neuroethics. In particular we focus on neuroethics work on agency.

Keywords: Neuroethics; bioethics; cognition; deep brain stimulation; mental health; neuroscience.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson J, & Honneth A (2005). Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays. 10.1017/CBO9780511610325.008 - DOI
    1. Baylis F (2011). “I Am Who I Am”: On the Perceived Threats to Personal Identity from Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics, 6(3), 513–526. 10.1007/s12152-011-9137-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bluhm R, Cabrera L, & McKenzie R (2019). What we (Should) Talk about when we Talk about Deep Brain Stimulation and Personal Identity. Neuroethics. 10.1007/s12152-019-09396-6 - DOI
    1. Clark A (2001). Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Gilbert F, Brown, Dasgupta, Martens Klein, & Goering. (2019). An Instrument to Capture the Phenomenology of Implantable Brain Device Use. Neuroethics. 10.1007/s12152-019-09422-7 - DOI

Publication types