Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Jul 23;17(15):5313.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155313.

Time Length of Negativization and Cycle Threshold Values in 182 Healthcare Workers with Covid-19 in Milan, Italy: An Observational Cohort Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Time Length of Negativization and Cycle Threshold Values in 182 Healthcare Workers with Covid-19 in Milan, Italy: An Observational Cohort Study

Lisa Cariani et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, becoming an unprecedented public health emergency. Rapid detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) suspected cases is crucial to control the spread of infection. We aimed to evaluate the time length of negativization from the onset of symptoms in healthcare workers (HCWs) with COVID-19, and to evaluate significant variations in cycle threshold (CT) values and gene positivity (E, RdRP, and N genes) among positive individuals who returned to work. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 182 SARS-CoV-2-positive HCWs in Milan, from 16 March to 30 April 2020. Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested by RT-PCR. Results: Asymptomatic HCWs were 17.6% (32/182), and 58 healed at 30 April 2020. The median time length of negativization was 4 weeks (35% of symptomatic versus 40% of asymptomatic HCWs). Four HCWs, healed at 30 April, turned positive within three weeks during controls set up in the work unit. Three-gene positivity had the greatest variability, and increasing CT values from single- to three-gene positivity among all age groups were observed. Conclusions: Self-isolation longer than two weeks and prolonged follow-up periods for the staff returning to work after COVID-19 could be the most suitable choices to counter the SARS-CoV-2 spread. Further studies are needed to investigate infectiousness profiles among positive individuals.

Keywords: Coronavirus Disease 2019; Cycle Threshold values; Reverse Transcription PCR; SARS-CoV-2; health care workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Simone Gambazza received personal fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and it was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Italy (368_2020bis).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for the management of healthcare workers (HCWs) with suspected or confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. According to the procedures implemented by Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan, all HCWs suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection must be tested by RT-PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal swabs and, if necessary, put into isolation for at least 14 days. The following criteria had to be met for discontinuation of quarantine: (a) resolution of respiratory symptoms and an apyretic state lasting longer than 72 h, and (b) two consecutively negative RT-PCR test results obtained on swabs collected at least 24 h apart. The same procedures were used for asymptomatic HCWs, with the exception of criteria (a).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timeline of cycle threshold (CT) value collection. An example according to a time length of negativization of 4 weeks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of gene positivity and mean cycle threshold (CT) values among different age groups. (A) Box-plot of mean viral load (cycle threshold) across different ages according to gene positivity. Empty circles represent a single observation for each gene. (B) Box-plot of mean viral load at baseline for the gene positivity E–RdRP–N among different age-groups. Empty circles represent a single observation for each age group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time at which HCWs, stratified by gene positivity, became negative.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guo Y.R., Cao Q.D., Hong Z.S., Tan Y.Y., Chen S.D., Jin H.J., Tan K.S., Wang D.Y., Yan Y. The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak—An update on the status. Mil. Med. Res. 2020;7:11. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Situation Report-108. [(accessed on 8 May 2020)];2020 Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
    1. Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., Li X., Yang B., Song J., Zhao X., Huang B., Shi W., Lu R., et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loeffelholz M.J., Tang Y.W. Laboratory diagnosis of emerging human coronavirus infections—The state of the art. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020;9:747–756. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1745095. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rothan H.A., Byrareddy S.N. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J. Autoimmun. 2020;109:102433. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types