Magnitude of problematic anger and its predictors in the Millennium Cohort
- PMID: 32718306
- PMCID: PMC7385895
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09206-2
Magnitude of problematic anger and its predictors in the Millennium Cohort
Abstract
Background: Problematic anger is intense anger associated with elevated generalized distress and that interferes with functioning. It also confers a heightened risk for the development of mental health problems. In military personnel and veterans, previous studies examining problematic anger have been constrained by sample size, cross-sectional data, and measurement limitations.
Methods: The current study used Millennium Cohort survey data (N = 90,266) from two time points (2013 and 2016 surveys) to assess the association of baseline demographics, military factors, mental health, positive perspective, and self-mastery, with subsequent problematic anger.
Results: Overall, 17.3% of respondents reported problematic anger. In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, greater risk of problematic anger was predicted by certain demographic characteristics as well as childhood trauma and financial problems. Service members who were in the Army or Marines, active duty (vs. reserves/national guard), and previously deployed with high levels of combat had increased risk for problematic anger. Veterans were also more likely to report problematic anger than currently serving personnel. Mental health predictors included posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and comorbid PTSD/MDD. Higher levels of positive perspective and self-mastery were associated with decreased risk of problematic anger.
Conclusion: Not only did 1 in 6 respondents report problematic anger, but risk factors were significant even after adjusting for PTSD and MDD, suggesting that problematic anger is more than an expression of these mental health problems. Results identify potential targets of early intervention and clinical treatment for addressing problematic anger in the military and veteran context.
Keywords: Anger; Cohort studies; Military.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Gibson DE. Emotion scripts in organizations: a multi-level model. In: Ashkanasy N, Cooper C, editors. Research companion to emotion in organizations. London: Edward Elgar Publishers; 2008. pp. 263–283.
-
- Geddes D, Callister RR, Gibson DE. A message in the madness: functions of workplace anger in organizational life. Acad Manag Perspect. 2020;34(1):28–47.
-
- Adler AB, Brossart DF, Toblin RL. Can anger be helpful?: soldier perceptions of the utility of anger. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017;205(9):692–698. - PubMed
-
- Novaco RW. The Novaco anger scale and provocation inventory (NAS-PI) Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 2003.
-
- Gonzalez OI, Novaco RW, Reger MA, Gahm GA. Anger intensification with combat-related PTSD and depression comorbidity. Psychol Trauma. 2016;8(1):9–16. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
